https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8202
Sidney Markowitz <sid...@sidney.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sid...@sidney.com
--- Comment #3 from Sidney Markowitz <sid...@sidney.com> ---
(In reply to Bill Cole from comment #2)
> I'm slightly confused by a comparison of those 2 messages: the only
> difference is the MID. They both have the same incomplete Received header
> showing the same MS client without any hint of a date, queueID, or receiving
> server. I'm not 100% comfortable with basing an exception to a useful rule
> based on what appear to be grossly redacted messages.
>
> Anyone else able to provide more complete samples?
I think the point is that Message-ID is being changed so the rule
meta FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA (__MOZILLA_MUA && !__UNUSABLE_MSGID &&
!__MOZILLA_MSGID)
describe FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla
fails because the Message-ID format no longer is correct for an email claiming
to be sent by a Mozilla MUA
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
