+1. From what I can see, it definitely does - though I must say I rarely do 
full end to end builds though. Maybe worth running as an experiment?


Thanks,
Hari

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Boesch <java...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Zinc absolutely helps - feels like makes builds  more than twice as fast -
> both on Mac and Linux.   It helps both on fresh and existing builds.
> 2014-10-24 14:06 GMT-07:00 Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com>:
>> Does Zinc still help if you are just running a single totally fresh
>> build? For the pull request builder we purge all state from previous
>> builds.
>>
>> - Patrick
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Hari Shreedharan
>> <hshreedha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> > I have zinc server running on my mac, and I see maven compilation to be
>> much
>> > better than before I had it running. Is the sbt build still faster
>> (sorry,
>> > long time since I did a build with sbt).
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Hari
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Overall I think this would be a good idea. The main blocker is just
>> >> that I think the Maven build is much slower right now than the SBT
>> >> build. However, if we were able to e.g. parallelize the test build on
>> >> Jenkins that might make up for it.
>> >>
>> >> I'd actually like to have a trigger where we could tests pull requests
>> >> with either one.
>> >>
>> >> - Patrick
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Hari Shreedharan
>> >> <hshreedha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >> > Over the last few months, it seems like we have selected Maven to be
>> the
>> >> > "official" build system for Spark.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I realize that removing the sbt build may not be easy, but it might
>> be a
>> >> > good idea to start looking into that. We had issues over the past few
>> days
>> >> > where mvn builds were fine, while sbt was failing to resolve
>> dependencies
>> >> > which were test-jars causing compilation of certain tests to fail.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > As a first step, I am wondering if it might be a good idea to change
>> the
>> >> > PR builder to mvn and test PRs consistent with the way we test
>> releases. I
>> >> > am not sure how technically feasible it is, but it would be a start to
>> >> > standardizing on one build system.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Hari
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>>
>>

Reply via email to