Your's are in the same ballpark with mine, where maven builds with zinc take about 1.4x the time to build with SBT.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Here's a crude benchmark on a Linux box (GCE n1-standard-4). zinc gets > the assembly build in range of SBT's time. > > mvn -DskipTests clean package > 15:27 > (start zinc) > 8:18 > (rebuild) > 7:08 > > ./sbt/sbt -DskipTests clean assembly > 5:10 > (start zinc) > 5:11 > (rebuild) > 5:06 > > The dependencies were already downloaded, and the whole build was > cleaned in between. > > These are smallish in comparison with time to run tests. I admit I > didn't run them here in the interest of time and because I assumed > zinc doesn't help that. > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Does Zinc still help if you are just running a single totally fresh > > build? For the pull request builder we purge all state from previous > > builds. > > > > - Patrick > > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Hari Shreedharan > > <hshreedha...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> I have zinc server running on my mac, and I see maven compilation to be > much > >> better than before I had it running. Is the sbt build still faster > (sorry, > >> long time since I did a build with sbt). > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Hari > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org > >
