tl;dr:

The critical internal APIs proposed to remain accessible in JDK 9 are:

sun.misc.{Signal,SignalHandler}

sun.misc.Unsafe (The functionality of many of the methods in this class is
now available via variable handles (JEP 193).)

sun.reflect.Reflection::getCallerClass(int) (The functionality of this
method may be provided in a standard form via JEP 259.)

sun.reflect.ReflectionFactory.newConstructorForSerialization


On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Felix Yang <felix.y...@oracle.com> wrote:

> Excuse me,
>
>    more detail of JDK 9 can be found here .
>
> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/
>
> The changes mentioned below were tracked in http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/
> 260
>
> If you want something digested, technical sessions in recent JavaOne would
> be quite helpful.
>
>
> There is a Quality Outreach program. Welcome to join and feedback.
>
> Quality Outreach: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/quality/Quality+
> Outreach
> Thanks,
> Felix
>
> On 2017/2/8 13:09, kant kodali wrote:
>
> Well and the module system!
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Timur Shenkao <t...@timshenkao.su> wrote:
>
>> If I'm not wrong, they got fid of   *sun.misc.Unsafe   *in Java 9.
>>
>> This class is till used by several libraries & frameworks.
>>
>> http://mishadoff.com/blog/java-magic-part-4-sun-dot-misc-dot-unsafe/
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Pete Robbins <robbin...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I agree but it may be worthwhile starting to look at this. I was
>>> just trying a build and it trips over some of the now defunct/inaccessible
>>> sun.misc classes.
>>>
>>> I was just interested in hearing if anyone has already gone through this
>>> to save me duplicating effort.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 at 11:46 Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't think anyone's tried it. I think we'd first have to agree to
>>>> drop Java 7 support before that could be seriously considered. The 8-9
>>>> difference is a bit more of a breaking change.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:44 AM Pete Robbins <robbin...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone working on support for running Spark on Java 9? Is this in a
>>>> roadmap anywhere?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to