Re: Java 9

Thu, 09 Feb 2017 04:59:05 -0800 

Hi,

Let me fill you in on the Quality Outreach.
I send out email every 2-3 weeks depending on contents of the builds, example attached. I try to highlight significant changes in the builds, allowing you to decide if you might want to test with a particular build. We don't expect you to test every build, it's entirely up to you.
If you would like us to list your project(s) on the Quality Outreach wiki [1] , can you provide a contact name , mailing list , the current status of you testing against JDK 8 & JDK 9, and a 
CI if possible  ?

Rgds, Rory

[1] https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/quality/Quality+Outreach
On 09/02/2017 10:10, Felix Yang wrote:


Excuse me,

   more detail of JDK 9 can be found here .

http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/
The changes mentioned below were tracked in http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/260
If you want something digested, technical sessions in recent JavaOne would be quite helpful. 


There is a Quality Outreach program. Welcome to join and feedback.
Quality Outreach: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/quality/Quality+Outreach 

Thanks,
Felix
On 2017/2/8 13:09, kant kodali wrote:

Well and the module system!
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Timur Shenkao <t...@timshenkao.su <mailto:t...@timshenkao.su>> wrote: 

    If I'm not wrong, they got fid of *sun.misc.Unsafe *in Java 9.*

    *
    This class is till used by several libraries & frameworks.

    http://mishadoff.com/blog/java-magic-part-4-sun-dot-misc-dot-unsafe/
    <http://mishadoff.com/blog/java-magic-part-4-sun-dot-misc-dot-unsafe/>

    On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Pete Robbins
    <robbin...@gmail.com <mailto:robbin...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        Yes, I agree but it may be worthwhile starting to look at
        this. I was just trying a build and it trips over some of the
        now defunct/inaccessible sun.misc classes.

        I was just interested in hearing if anyone has already gone
        through this to save me duplicating effort.

        Cheers,

        On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 at 11:46 Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com
        <mailto:so...@cloudera.com>> wrote:

            I don't think anyone's tried it. I think we'd first have
            to agree to drop Java 7 support before that could be
            seriously considered. The 8-9 difference is a bit more of
            a breaking change.

            On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:44 AM Pete Robbins
            <robbin...@gmail.com <mailto:robbin...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                Is anyone working on support for running Spark on
                Java 9? Is this in a roadmap anywhere?


                Cheers,







--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland
--- Begin Message ---


JDK 9 Early Access  b151  is available on java.net

There have been a number of fixes to bugs reported by Open Source projects since the last availability email  :
  • JDK-8171377 : Add sun.misc.Unsafe::invokeCleaner
  • JDK-8075793 : Source incompatibility for inference using -source 7
  • JDK-8087303  : LSSerializer pretty print does not work anymore
  • JDK-8167143 :CLDR timezone parsing does not work for all locales

Other changes that maybe of interest:

  • JDK-8066474 : Remove the lib/$ARCH directory from Linux and Solaris images
  • JDK-8170428 : Move src.zip to JDK/lib/src.zip

JEPs intergrated:

  •  JEP 295: Ahead-of-Time Compilation has been integrated in b150.
Schedule - Milestones since last availability email 
  • Feature Extension Complete 22nd of December 2016
  • Rampdown Started 5th of January 2017
    • Phases in which increasing levels of scrutiny are applied to incoming changes.
    • In phase 1, only P1-P3 bugs can be fixed. In phase 2 only showstopper bugs can be fixed.

Rgds,Rory

-- 
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland

--- End Message ---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to