At first glance the error seems similar to one Pedro Rodriguez ran into
during 2.0, so I'm looping Pedor in if they happen to have any insight into
what was the cause last time.

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> wrote:

> Sure, let me dig into it :)
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Michael Armbrust <mich...@databricks.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Have time to figure out why the doc build failed?
>> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20Release/
>> job/spark-release-docs/60/console
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If it would help I'd be more than happy to look at kicking off the
>>> packaging for RC3 since I'v been poking around in Jenkins a bit (for 
>>> SPARK-20216
>>> & friends) (I'd still probably need some guidance from a previous release
>>> coordinator so I understand if that's not actually faster).
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 6:39 PM, DB Tsai <dbt...@dbtsai.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I backported the fix into both branch-2.1 and branch-2.0. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> DB Tsai
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Web: https://www.dbtsai.com
>>>> PGP Key ID: 0x5CED8B896A6BDFA0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com> wrote:
>>>> > DB,
>>>> >
>>>> > This vote already failed and there isn't a RC3 vote yet. If you
>>>> backport the
>>>> > changes to branch-2.1 they will make it into the next RC.
>>>> >
>>>> > rb
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 3:55 PM, DB Tsai <dbt...@dbtsai.com> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> -1
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I think that back-porting SPARK-20270 and SPARK-18555 are very
>>>> important
>>>> >> since it's a critical bug that na.fill will mess up the data in Long
>>>> even
>>>> >> the data isn't null.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thanks.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Sincerely,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> DB Tsai
>>>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >> Web: https://www.dbtsai.com
>>>> >> PGP Key ID: 0x5CED8B896A6BDFA0
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Following up, the issues with missing pypandoc/pandoc on the
>>>> packaging
>>>> >>> machine has been resolved.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> See SPARK-20216, if Michael can let me know which machine is being
>>>> used
>>>> >>>> for packaging I can see if I can install pandoc on it (should be
>>>> simple but
>>>> >>>> I know the Jenkins cluster is a bit on the older side).
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca
>>>> >
>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> So the fix is installing pandoc on whichever machine is used for
>>>> >>>>> packaging. I thought that was generally done on the machine of
>>>> the person
>>>> >>>>> rolling the release so I wasn't sure it made sense as a JIRA, but
>>>> from
>>>> >>>>> chatting with Josh it sounds like that part might be on of the
>>>> Jenkins
>>>> >>>>> workers - is there a fixed one that is used?
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Regardless I'll file a JIRA for this when I get back in front of
>>>> my
>>>> >>>>> desktop (~1 hour or so).
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM Michael Armbrust
>>>> >>>>> <mich...@databricks.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the comments everyone.  This vote fails.  Here's how I
>>>> >>>>>> think we should proceed:
>>>> >>>>>>  - [SPARK-20197] - SparkR CRAN - appears to be resolved
>>>> >>>>>>  - [SPARK-XXXX] - Python packaging - Holden, please file a JIRA
>>>> and
>>>> >>>>>> report if this is a regression and if there is an easy fix that
>>>> we should
>>>> >>>>>> wait for.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> For all the other test failures, please take the time to look
>>>> through
>>>> >>>>>> JIRA and open an issue if one does not already exist so that we
>>>> can triage
>>>> >>>>>> if these are just environmental issues.  If I don't hear any
>>>> objections I'm
>>>> >>>>>> going to go ahead with RC3 tomorrow.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Felix Cheung
>>>> >>>>>> <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> -1
>>>> >>>>>>> sorry, found an issue with SparkR CRAN check.
>>>> >>>>>>> Opened SPARK-20197 and working on fix.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>> >>>>>>> From: holden.ka...@gmail.com <holden.ka...@gmail.com> on
>>>> behalf of
>>>> >>>>>>> Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
>>>> >>>>>>> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 6:25:20 PM
>>>> >>>>>>> To: Xiao Li
>>>> >>>>>>> Cc: Michael Armbrust; dev@spark.apache.org
>>>> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark 2.1.1 (RC2)
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> -1 (non-binding)
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> Python packaging doesn't seem to have quite worked out (looking
>>>> at
>>>> >>>>>>> PKG-INFO the description is "Description: !!!!! missing pandoc
>>>> do not upload
>>>> >>>>>>> to PyPI !!!!"), ideally it would be nice to have this as a
>>>> version we
>>>> >>>>>>> upgrade to PyPi.
>>>> >>>>>>> Building this on my own machine results in a longer description.
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> My guess is that whichever machine was used to package this is
>>>> >>>>>>> missing the pandoc executable (or possibly pypandoc library).
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> +1
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> Xiao
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>> 2017-03-30 16:09 GMT-07:00 Michael Armbrust
>>>> >>>>>>>> <mich...@databricks.com>:
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>>>> Spark
>>>> >>>>>>>>> version 2.1.0. The vote is open until Sun, April 2nd, 2018 at
>>>> 16:30 PST and
>>>> >>>>>>>>> passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.1.1
>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://spark.apache.org/
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is v2.1.1-rc2
>>>> >>>>>>>>> (02b165dcc2ee5245d1293a375a31660c9d4e1fa6)
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> List of JIRA tickets resolved can be found with this filter.
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>>>> found
>>>> >>>>>>>>> at:
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.1.1-
>>>> rc2-bin/
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>> spark-1227/
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found
>>>> at:
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.1.
>>>> 1-rc2-docs/
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> FAQ
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> How can I help test this release?
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by
>>>> >>>>>>>>> taking an existing Spark workload and running on this release
>>>> candidate,
>>>> >>>>>>>>> then reporting any regressions.
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.1.1?
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely
>>>> important bug
>>>> >>>>>>>>> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact
>>>> compatibility should be
>>>> >>>>>>>>> worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to
>>>> 2.1.2 or 2.2.0.
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> But my bug isn't fixed!??!
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold
>>>> the
>>>> >>>>>>>>> release unless the bug in question is a regression from 2.1.0.
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> What happened to RC1?
>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>> There were issues with the release packaging and as a result
>>>> was
>>>> >>>>>>>>> skipped.
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>> --
>>>> >>>>>>> Cell : 425-233-8271 <(425)%20233-8271>
>>>> >>>>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>> --
>>>> >>>>> Cell : 425-233-8271
>>>> >>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> --
>>>> >>>> Cell : 425-233-8271
>>>> >>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> --
>>>> >>> Cell : 425-233-8271
>>>> >>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Ryan Blue
>>>> > Software Engineer
>>>> > Netflix
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cell : 425-233-8271 <(425)%20233-8271>
>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cell : 425-233-8271 <(425)%20233-8271>
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>



-- 
Cell : 425-233-8271
Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau

Reply via email to