I think one build is enough, but haven't thought it through. The
Hadoop 2.6/2.7 builds are already nearly redundant. 2.12 is probably
best advertised as a 'beta'. So maybe publish a no-hadoop build of it?
Really, whatever's the easy thing to do.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 10:28 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ah I missed the Scala 2.12 build. Do you mean we should publish a Scala 2.12 
> build this time? Current for Scala 2.11 we have 3 builds: with hadoop 2.7, 
> with hadoop 2.6, without hadoop. Shall we do the same thing for Scala 2.12?
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:14 AM Sean Owen <sro...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> A few preliminary notes:
>>
>> Wenchen for some weird reason when I hit your key in gpg --import, it
>> asks for a passphrase. When I skip it, it's fine, gpg can still verify
>> the signature. No issue there really.
>>
>> The staging repo gives a 404:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1285/
>> 404 - Repository "orgapachespark-1285 (staging: open)"
>> [id=orgapachespark-1285] exists but is not exposed.
>>
>> The (revamped) licenses are OK, though there are some minor glitches
>> in the final release tarballs (my fault) : there's an extra directory,
>> and the source release has both binary and source licenses. I'll fix
>> that. Not strictly necessary to reject the release over those.
>>
>> Last, when I check the staging repo I'll get my answer, but, were you
>> able to build 2.12 artifacts as well?
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 9:48 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 
>> > 2.4.0.
>> >
>> > The vote is open until September 20 PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC 
>> > votes are cast, with
>> > a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.4.0
>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> >
>> > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/
>> >
>> > The tag to be voted on is v2.4.0-rc1 (commit 
>> > 1220ab8a0738b5f67dc522df5e3e77ffc83d207a):
>> > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v2.4.0-rc1
>> >
>> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.4.0-rc1-bin/
>> >
>> > Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>> >
>> > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1285/
>> >
>> > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.4.0-rc1-docs/
>> >
>> > The list of bug fixes going into 2.4.0 can be found at the following URL:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/2.4.0
>> >
>> > FAQ
>> >
>> > =========================
>> > How can I help test this release?
>> > =========================
>> >
>> > If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>> > an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>> > reporting any regressions.
>> >
>> > If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
>> > the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala
>> > you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test
>> > with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
>> > you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
>> >
>> > ===========================================
>> > What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.4.0?
>> > ===========================================
>> >
>> > The current list of open tickets targeted at 2.4.0 can be found at:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target 
>> > Version/s" = 2.4.0
>> >
>> > Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
>> > fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
>> > be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
>> > appropriate release.
>> >
>> > ==================
>> > But my bug isn't fixed?
>> > ==================
>> >
>> > In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>> > release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
>> > release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
>> > that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
>> > help target the issue.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to