Thanks for the check, Felix!

Yea, I'll wait for the new test report.
But, it never took so much time to run tests in branch-2.3 before, ...
network issue?

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:19 AM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> I’ve tried a couple of times. The latest test run took 12 hr+
>
> 1 aborted suite:
> 00:53:25.769 WARN
> org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite: Failed to
> download Spark 2.3.2 from
> http://mirrors.koehn.com/apache//spark/spark-2.3.2/spark-2.3.2-bin-hadoop2.7.tgz:
> Error writing to server
> 00:53:25.812 WARN
> org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite: Failed to
> download Spark 2.3.2 from
> http://mirror.cc.columbia.edu/pub/software/apache//spark/spark-2.3.2/spark-2.3.2-bin-hadoop2.7.tgz:
> Error writing to server
> 00:53:25.838 WARN
> org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite: Failed to
> download Spark 2.3.2 from
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/spark/spark-2.3.2/spark-2.3.2-bin-hadoop2.7.tgz:
> Socket closed
>
> org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite *** ABORTED ***
> Exception encountered when invoking run on a nested suite - Unable to
> download Spark 2.3.2 (HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite.scala:97)
>
> And then it stopped. I checked this morning the archive link should be
> valid. Try to see if I can try again/resume from it.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, January 20, 2019 6:45 PM
> *To:* Sean Owen
> *Cc:* Spark dev list
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.3.3 (RC1)
>
> Oh, sorry for that and I misunderstood the Apache release policy.
> Yea, its ok to keep the RC1 voting.
>
> Best,
> Takeshi
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:07 AM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, if it passes tests, I'm +1 on the release.
>> Can anyone else verify the tests pass?
>>
>> What is the reason for a new RC? I didn't see any other issues reported.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi, all
>> >
>> > Thanks for the checks, Sean and Felix.
>> > I'll start the next vote as RC2 this Tuesday noon (PST).
>> >
>> > > Sean
>> > I re-run JavaTfIdfSuite on my env and it passed.
>> > I used `-Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Pmesos
>> -Psparkr` and
>> > run the tests on a EC2 instance below (I launched the new instance for
>> the tests);
>> > ----
>> > $ cat /etc/os-release
>> > NAME="Amazon Linux"
>> > VERSION="2"
>> > ID="amzn"
>> > ID_LIKE="centos rhel fedora"
>> > VERSION_ID="2"
>> > PRETTY_NAME="Amazon Linux 2"
>> > ANSI_COLOR="0;33"
>> > CPE_NAME="cpe:2.3:o:amazon:amazon_linux:2"
>> > HOME_URL="https://amazonlinux.com/";
>> > $ java -version
>> > openjdk version "1.8.0_191"
>> > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_191-b12)
>> > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.191-b12, mixed mode)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 9:53 AM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> My focus is on R (sorry couldn’t cross validate what’s Sean is seeing)
>> >>
>> >> tested:
>> >> reviewed doc
>> >> R package test
>> >> win-builder, r-hub
>> >> Tarball/package signature
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________
>> >> From: Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com>
>> >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 6:49 PM
>> >> To: Spark dev list
>> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 2.3.3 (RC1)
>> >>
>> >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>> version 2.3.3.
>> >>
>> >> The vote is open until January 20 8:00PM (PST) and passes if a
>> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with
>> >> a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>> >>
>> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.3.3
>> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> >>
>> >> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/
>> >>
>> >> The tag to be voted on is v2.3.3-rc1 (commit
>> b5ea9330e3072e99841270b10dc1d2248127064b):
>> >> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v2.3.3-rc1
>> >>
>> >> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.3.3-rc1-bin/
>> >>
>> >> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>> >>
>> >> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1297
>> >>
>> >> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.3.3-rc1-docs/
>> >>
>> >> The list of bug fixes going into 2.3.3 can be found at the following
>> URL:
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12343759
>> >>
>> >> FAQ
>> >>
>> >> =========================
>> >> How can I help test this release?
>> >> =========================
>> >>
>> >> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>> >> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>> >> reporting any regressions.
>> >>
>> >> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
>> >> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala
>> >> you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test
>> >> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
>> >> you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
>> >>
>> >> ===========================================
>> >> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.3.3?
>> >> ===========================================
>> >>
>> >> The current list of open tickets targeted at 2.3.3 can be found at:
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target
>> Version/s" = 2.3.3
>> >>
>> >> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
>> >> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
>> >> be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
>> >> appropriate release.
>> >>
>> >> ==================
>> >> But my bug isn't fixed?
>> >> ==================
>> >>
>> >> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>> >> release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
>> >> release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
>> >> that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
>> >> help target the issue.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> ---
>> >> Takeshi Yamamuro
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > ---
>> > Takeshi Yamamuro
>>
>
>
> --
> ---
> Takeshi Yamamuro
>


-- 
---
Takeshi Yamamuro

Reply via email to