Thank you, Hyukjin.
+1 for closing according to 2.3.x EOL.
For the timing, please do that after the official 2.3.4 release
announcement.
Bests,
Dongjoon.
On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 16:27 Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think simply closing old issues with no activity in a long time is
> OK. The "Affected Version" is somewhat noisy, so not even particularly
> important to also query, but yeah I see some value in trying to limit
> the scope this way.
>
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 10:15 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > HI all,
> >
> > We have resolved JIRAs that targets EOL releases (up to Spark 2.2.x) in
> order to make it
> > the manageable size before.
> > Since Spark 2.3.4 will be EOL release, I plan to do this again roughly
> in a week.
> >
> > The JIRAs that has not been updated for the last year, and having affect
> version of EOL releases will be:
> > - Resolved as 'Incomplete' status
> > - Has a 'bulk-closed' label.
> >
> > I plan to use this JQL
> >
> > project = SPARK
> > AND status in (Open, "In Progress", Reopened)
> > AND (
> > affectedVersion = EMPTY OR
> > NOT (affectedVersion in versionMatch("^3.*")
> > OR affectedVersion in versionMatch("^2.4.*")
> > )
> > )
> > AND updated <= -52w
> >
> >
> > You could click this link and check.
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20(affectedVersion%20%3D%20EMPTY%20OR%20NOT%20(affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E3.*%22)%20OR%20affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E2.4.*%22)))%20AND%20updated%20%3C%3D%20-52w
> >
> > Please let me know if you guys have any concern or opinion on this.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>
>
