I'd only tweak this to perhaps not close JIRAs that have been updated
recently -- even just avoiding things updated in the last month. For
example this would close
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-27758 which
was opened Friday (though, for other reasons it should probably be closed).
Still I don't mind it under the logic that it has been reported against
2.1.0.
On the other hand, I'd go further and close _anything_ not updated in a
long time, like a year (or 2 if feeling conservative). That is there's
probably a lot of old cruft out there that wasn't marked with an Affected
Version, before that was required.
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:48 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks guys.
>
> This thread got more than 3 PMC votes without any objection. I slightly
> edited JQL from Abdeali's suggestion (thanks, Abdeali).
>
>
> JQL:
>
> project = SPARK
> AND status in (Open, "In Progress", Reopened)
> AND (
> affectedVersion = EMPTY OR
> NOT (affectedVersion in versionMatch("^3.*")
> OR affectedVersion in versionMatch("^2.4.*")
> OR affectedVersion in versionMatch("^2.3.*")
> )
> )
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20%0A%20%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%0A%20%20AND%20(%0A%20%20%20%20affectedVersion%20%3D%20EMPTY%20OR%0A%20%20%20%20NOT%20(affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E3.*%22)%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20OR%20affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E2.4.*%22)%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20OR%20affectedVersion%20in%20versionMatch(%22%5E2.3.*%22)%0A%20%20%20%20)%0A%20%20)
>
>
> It means we will resolve all JIRAs that have EOL releases as affected
> versions, including no version specified in affected versions - this will
> reduce open JIRAs under 900.
>
> Looks I can use a bulk action feature in JIRA. Tomorrow at the similar
> time, I will
> - Label those JIRAs as 'bulk-closed'
> - Resolve them via `Incomplete` status.
>
> Please double check the list and let me know if you guys have any concern.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2019년 5월 18일 (토) 오후 12:22, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>
>> +1, too.
>>
>> Thank you, Hyukjin!
>>
>> Bests,
>> Dongjoon.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 9:07 AM Imran Rashid <iras...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1, thanks for taking this on
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 7:26 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> oh, wait. 'Incomplete' can still make sense in this way then.
>>>> Yes, I am good with 'Incomplete' too.
>>>>
>>>> 2019년 5월 16일 (목) 오전 11:24, Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>>>>
>>>>> I actually recently used 'Incomplete' a bit when the JIRA is
>>>>> basically too poorly formed (like just copying and pasting an error) ...
>>>>>
>>>>> I was thinking about 'Unresolved' status or `Auto Closed' too. I
>>>>> double checked they can be reopen as well after resolution.
>>>>>
>>>>> [image: Screen Shot 2019-05-16 at 10.35.14 AM.png]
>>>>> [image: Screen Shot 2019-05-16 at 10.35.39 AM.png]
>>>>>
>>>>> 2019년 5월 16일 (목) 오전 11:04, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Agree, anything without an Affected Version should be old enough to
>>>>>> time out.
>>>>>> I might use "Incomplete" or something as the status, as we haven't
>>>>>> otherwise used that. Maybe that's simpler than a label. But, anything
>>>>>> like
>>>>>> that sounds good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 8:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW, affected version became a required field (I don't remember when
>>>>>>> exactly was .. I believe it's around when we work on Spark 2.3):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [image: Screen Shot 2019-05-16 at 10.29.50 AM.png]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, including all EOL versions and affected versions not specified
>>>>>>> will roughly work.
>>>>>>> Using "Cannot Reproduce" as its status and 'bulk-closed' label makes
>>>>>>> the best sense to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Okie. I want to open this roughly for a week before taking an actual
>>>>>>> action for this. If there's no more feedback, I will do as I said ^ next
>>>>>>> week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2019년 5월 15일 (수) 오후 11:33, Josh Rosen <rosenvi...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 in favor of some sort of JIRA cleanup.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My only request is that we attach some sort of 'bulk-closed' label
>>>>>>>> to issues that we close via JIRA filter batch operations (and resolve
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> issues as "Timed Out" / "Cannot Reproduce", not "Fixed"). Using a label
>>>>>>>> makes it easier to audit what was closed, simplifying the process of
>>>>>>>> identifying and re-opening valid issues caught in our dragnet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 7:19 AM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I gave up looking through JIRAs a long time ago, so, big respect
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> continuing to try to triage them. I am afraid we're missing a few
>>>>>>>>> important bug reports in the torrent, but most JIRAs are not
>>>>>>>>> well-formed, just questions, stale, or simply things that won't be
>>>>>>>>> added. I do think it's important to reflect that reality, and so
>>>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>>>> always in favor of more aggressively closing JIRAs. I think this is
>>>>>>>>> more standard practice, from projects like TensorFlow/Keras,
>>>>>>>>> pandas,
>>>>>>>>> etc to just automatically drop Issues that don't see activity for N
>>>>>>>>> days. We won't do that, but, are probably on the other hand far too
>>>>>>>>> lax in closing them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Remember that JIRAs stay searchable and can be reopened, so it's
>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>> like we lose much information.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd close anything that hasn't had activity in 2 years (?), as a
>>>>>>>>> start.
>>>>>>>>> I like the idea of closing things that only affect an EOL release,
>>>>>>>>> but, many items aren't marked, so may need to cast the net wider.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think only then does it make sense to look at bothering to
>>>>>>>>> reproduce
>>>>>>>>> or evaluate the 1000s that will still remain.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:25 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Hi all,
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > I would like to propose to resolve all JIRAs that affects EOL
>>>>>>>>> releases - 2.2 and below. and affected version
>>>>>>>>> > not specified. I was rather against this way and considered this
>>>>>>>>> as last resort in roughly 3 years ago
>>>>>>>>> > when we discussed. Now I think we should go ahead with this. See
>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > I have been talking care of this for so long time almost every
>>>>>>>>> day those 3 years. The number of JIRAs
>>>>>>>>> > keeps increasing and it does never go down. Now the number is
>>>>>>>>> going over 2500 JIRAs.
>>>>>>>>> > Did you guys know? in JIRA, we can only go through page by page
>>>>>>>>> up to 1000 items. So, currently we're even
>>>>>>>>> > having difficulties to go through every JIRA. We should manually
>>>>>>>>> filter out and check each.
>>>>>>>>> > The number is going over the manageable size.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > I am not suggesting this without anything actually trying. This
>>>>>>>>> is what we have tried within my visibility:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > 1. In roughly 3 years ago, Sean tried to gather committers and
>>>>>>>>> even non-committers people to sort
>>>>>>>>> > out this number. At that time, we were only able to keep
>>>>>>>>> this number as is. After we lost this momentum,
>>>>>>>>> > it kept increasing back.
>>>>>>>>> > 2. At least I scanned _all_ the previous JIRAs at least more
>>>>>>>>> than two times and resolved them. Roughly
>>>>>>>>> > once a year. The rest of them are mostly obsolete but not
>>>>>>>>> enough information to investigate further.
>>>>>>>>> > 3. I strictly stick to "Contributing to JIRA Maintenance"
>>>>>>>>> https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html and
>>>>>>>>> > resolve JIRAs.
>>>>>>>>> > 4. Promoting other people to comment on JIRA or actively
>>>>>>>>> resolve them.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > One of the facts I realised is the increasing number of
>>>>>>>>> committers doesn't virtually help this much (although
>>>>>>>>> > it might be helpful if somebody active in JIRA becomes a
>>>>>>>>> committer.)
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > One of the important thing I should note is that, it's now
>>>>>>>>> almost pretty difficult to reproduce and test the
>>>>>>>>> > issues found in EOL releases. We should git clone, checkout,
>>>>>>>>> build and test. And then, see if that issue
>>>>>>>>> > still exists in upstream, and fix. This is non-trivial overhead.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Therefore, I would like to propose resolving _all_ the JIRAs
>>>>>>>>> that targets EOL releases - 2.2 and below.
>>>>>>>>> > Please let me know if anyone has some concerns or objections.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
