+1 Thanks Yuanjian -- I think it'll be great to have a 3.0.1 release soon.

Shivaram

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:43 AM Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the heads-up, Yuanjian!
>
> > I also noticed branch-3.0 already has 39 commits after Spark 3.0.0.
> wow, the updates are so quick. Anyway, +1 for the release.
>
> Bests,
> Takeshi
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:59 PM Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi dev-list,
>>
>>
>> I’m writing this to raise the discussion about Spark 3.0.1 feasibility since 
>> 4 blocker issues were found after Spark 3.0.0:
>>
>>
>> [SPARK-31990] The state store compatibility broken will cause a correctness 
>> issue when Streaming query with `dropDuplicate` uses the checkpoint written 
>> by the old Spark version.
>>
>> [SPARK-32038] The regression bug in handling NaN values in COUNT(DISTINCT)
>>
>> [SPARK-31918][WIP] CRAN requires to make it working with the latest R 4.0. 
>> It makes the 3.0 release unavailable on CRAN, and only supports R [3.5, 4.0)
>>
>> [SPARK-31967] Downgrade vis.js to fix Jobs UI loading time regression
>>
>>
>> I also noticed branch-3.0 already has 39 commits after Spark 3.0.0. I think 
>> it would be great if we have Spark 3.0.1 to deliver the critical fixes.
>>
>>
>> Any comments are appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Yuanjian
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ---
> Takeshi Yamamuro

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to