+1, the issues mentioned are really serious. On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:56 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1. > > Just as a note, > - SPARK-31918 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31918> is > fixed now, and there's no blocker. - When we build SparkR, we should use > the latest R version at least 4.0.0+. > > 2020년 6월 24일 (수) 오전 11:20, Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > >> +1 >> >> Bests, >> Dongjoon. >> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 1:19 PM Jungtaek Lim < >> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 on a 3.0.1 soon. >>> >>> Probably it would be nice if some Scala experts can take a look at >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32051 and include the fix >>> into 3.0.1 if possible. >>> Looks like APIs designed to work with Scala 2.11 & Java bring >>> ambiguity in Scala 2.12 & Java. >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:52 AM Jules Damji <dmat...@comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :) >>>> >>>> On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:36 AM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 on a patch release soon >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:47 AM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 on doing a new patch release soon. I saw some of these issues when >>>>> preparing the 3.0 release, and some of them are very serious. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:06 AM, Shivaram Venkataraman < >>>>> shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 Thanks Yuanjian -- I think it'll be great to have a 3.0.1 release >>>>>> soon. >>>>>> >>>>>> Shivaram >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:43 AM Takeshi Yamamuro < >>>>>> linguin....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the heads-up, Yuanjian! >>>>>> >>>>>> I also noticed branch-3.0 already has 39 commits after Spark 3.0.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> wow, the updates are so quick. Anyway, +1 for the release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bests, >>>>>> Takeshi >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:59 PM Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanj...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi dev-list, >>>>>> >>>>>> I’m writing this to raise the discussion about Spark 3.0.1 >>>>>> feasibility since 4 blocker issues were found after Spark 3.0.0: >>>>>> >>>>>> [SPARK-31990] The state store compatibility broken will cause a >>>>>> correctness issue when Streaming query with `dropDuplicate` uses the >>>>>> checkpoint written by the old Spark version. >>>>>> >>>>>> [SPARK-32038] The regression bug in handling NaN values in >>>>>> COUNT(DISTINCT) >>>>>> >>>>>> [SPARK-31918][WIP] CRAN requires to make it working with the latest R >>>>>> 4.0. It makes the 3.0 release unavailable on CRAN, and only supports R >>>>>> [3.5, 4.0) >>>>>> >>>>>> [SPARK-31967] Downgrade vis.js to fix Jobs UI loading time regression >>>>>> >>>>>> I also noticed branch-3.0 already has 39 commits after Spark 3.0.0. I >>>>>> think it would be great if we have Spark 3.0.1 to deliver the critical >>>>>> fixes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any comments are appreciated. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Yuanjian >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Takeshi Yamamuro >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >>>> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >>>> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> >>>> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >>>> >>>>
