I agree. Such old JIRAs are 99% obsolete. If anyone objects to a particular issue being closed, they can comment and we can reopen. It's a very reversible thing. There is value in keeping JIRA up to date with reality.
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 8:47 PM Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, dev, > > As you know, we have too many open JIRAs now: > # of open JIRAs=2698: JQL='project = SPARK AND status in (Open, "In > Progress", Reopened)' > > We've recently released v2.4.8(EOL), so I'd like to bulk-close too old > JIRAs > for making the JIRAs manageable. > > As Hyukjin did the same action two years ago (for details, see: > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Resolving-all-JIRAs-affecting-EOL-releases-td27838.html), > I'm planning to use a similar JQL below to close them: > > project = SPARK AND status in (Open, "In Progress", Reopened) AND > (affectedVersion = EMPTY OR NOT (affectedVersion in versionMatch("^3.*"))) > AND updated <= -52w > > The total number of matched JIRAs is 741. > Or, we might be able to close them more aggressively by removing the > version condition: > > project = SPARK AND status in (Open, "In Progress", Reopened) AND updated > <= -52w > > The matched number is 1484 (almost half of the current open JIRAs). > > If there is no objection, I'd like to do it next week or later. > Any thoughts? > > Bests, > Takeshi > -- > --- > Takeshi Yamamuro >
