+1. Thank you, Takeshi.
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:49 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I wanted to discuss this. I agree since 2.4.x became EOL > > 2021년 5월 20일 (목) 오전 10:54, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > >> I agree. Such old JIRAs are 99% obsolete. If anyone objects to a >> particular issue being closed, they can comment and we can reopen. It's a >> very reversible thing. There is value in keeping JIRA up to date with >> reality. >> >> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 8:47 PM Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, dev, >>> >>> As you know, we have too many open JIRAs now: >>> # of open JIRAs=2698: JQL='project = SPARK AND status in (Open, "In >>> Progress", Reopened)' >>> >>> We've recently released v2.4.8(EOL), so I'd like to bulk-close too old >>> JIRAs >>> for making the JIRAs manageable. >>> >>> As Hyukjin did the same action two years ago (for details, see: >>> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Resolving-all-JIRAs-affecting-EOL-releases-td27838.html), >>> I'm planning to use a similar JQL below to close them: >>> >>> project = SPARK AND status in (Open, "In Progress", Reopened) AND >>> (affectedVersion = EMPTY OR NOT (affectedVersion in versionMatch("^3.*"))) >>> AND updated <= -52w >>> >>> The total number of matched JIRAs is 741. >>> Or, we might be able to close them more aggressively by removing the >>> version condition: >>> >>> project = SPARK AND status in (Open, "In Progress", Reopened) AND >>> updated <= -52w >>> >>> The matched number is 1484 (almost half of the current open JIRAs). >>> >>> If there is no objection, I'd like to do it next week or later. >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> Bests, >>> Takeshi >>> -- >>> --- >>> Takeshi Yamamuro >>> >>
