Hey Mich Adding to what Mich is suggesting, how about having the base OS version in the image tag as well, like
<PRODUCT_VERSION>-<SCALA_VERSION>-<JAVA_VERSION>-<BASE_OS> 3.1.2-scala_2.12-java11-slim 3.1.2_sparkpy-scala_2.12-java11-buster 3.1.2_sparkR-scala_2.12-java11-slim Regards. Ankit Prakash Gupta info.ank...@gmail.com LinkedIn : https://www.linkedin.com/in/infoankitp/ Medium: https://medium.com/@info.ankitp On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 5:39 PM Mich Talebzadeh <mich.talebza...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I propose that for Spark docker images we follow the following convention > similar to flink <https://hub.docker.com/_/flink>as shown in the attached > file > > So for Spark we will have > > > <PRODUCT_VERSION>-<SCALA_VERSION>-<JAVA_VERSION> > > 3.1.2-scala_2.12-java11 > 3.1.2_sparkpy-scala_2.12-java11 > 3.1.2_sparkR-scala_2.12-java11 > > > If this makes sense please respond, otherwise state your preference > > > HTH > > > *Disclaimer:* Use it at your own risk. Any and all responsibility for any > loss, damage or destruction of data or any other property which may arise > from relying on this email's technical content is explicitly disclaimed. > The author will in no case be liable for any monetary damages arising from > such loss, damage or destruction. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
