Cutting the branch is simple, but we need to avoid backporting the feature work that are not being well discussed. Not all the members are actively following the dev list. I think we should wait 3 more days for collecting the PR list before cutting the branch.
BTW, there are very few 3.4-only feature work that will be affected. Xiao Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> 于2022年3月15日周二 11:49写道： > Hi, Max, Chao, Xiao, Holden and all. > > I have a different idea. > > Given the situation and small patch list, I don't think we need to > postpone the branch cut for those patches. It's easier to cut a branch-3.3 > and allow backporting. > > As of today, we already have an obvious Apache Spark 3.4 patch in the > branch together. This situation only becomes worse and worse because there > is no way to block the other patches from landing unintentionally if we > don't cut a branch. > > [SPARK-38335][SQL] Implement parser support for DEFAULT column values > > Let's cut `branch-3.3` Today for Apache Spark 3.3.0 preparation. > > Best, > Dongjoon. > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:17 AM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Cool, thanks for clarifying! >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:11 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> For the following list: >> >> #35789 [SPARK-32268][SQL] Row-level Runtime Filtering >> >> #34659 [SPARK-34863][SQL] Support complex types for Parquet vectorized >> reader >> >> #35848 [SPARK-38548][SQL] New SQL function: try_sum >> >> Do you mean we should include them, or exclude them from 3.3? >> > >> > >> > If possible, I hope these features can be shipped with Spark 3.3. >> > >> > >> > >> > Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> 于2022年3月15日周二 10:06写道： >> >> >> >> Hi Xiao, >> >> >> >> For the following list: >> >> >> >> #35789 [SPARK-32268][SQL] Row-level Runtime Filtering >> >> #34659 [SPARK-34863][SQL] Support complex types for Parquet vectorized >> reader >> >> #35848 [SPARK-38548][SQL] New SQL function: try_sum >> >> >> >> Do you mean we should include them, or exclude them from 3.3? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Chao >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 9:56 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > The following was tested and merged a few minutes ago. So, we can >> remove it from the list. >> >> > >> >> > #35819 [SPARK-38524][SPARK-38553][K8S] Bump Volcano to v1.5.1 >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Dongjoon. >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 9:48 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Let me clarify my above suggestion. Maybe we can wait 3 more days >> to collect the list of actively developed PRs that we want to merge to 3.3 >> after the branch cut? >> >> >> >> >> >> Please do not rush to merge the PRs that are not fully reviewed. We >> can cut the branch this Friday and continue merging the PRs that have been >> discussed in this thread. Does that make sense? >> >> >> >> >> >> Xiao >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> 于2022年3月15日周二 09:10写道： >> >> >>> >> >> >>> May I suggest we push out one week (22nd) just to give everyone a >> bit of breathing space? Rushed software development more often results in >> bugs. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 6:23 AM Yikun Jiang <yikunk...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> > To make our release time more predictable, let us collect the >> PRs and wait three more days before the branch cut? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> For SPIP: Support Customized Kubernetes Schedulers: >> >> >>>> #35819 [SPARK-38524][SPARK-38553][K8S] Bump Volcano to v1.5.1 >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Three more days are OK for this from my view. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Regards, >> >> >>>> Yikun >> >> >>> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >> >> >>> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 >> >> >>> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >> >
