Hello All, Below is current status of features from the allow list:
IN PROGRESS: 1. SPARK-37396: Inline type hint files for files in python/pyspark/mllib 2. SPARK-37395: Inline type hint files for files in python/pyspark/ml 3. SPARK-37093: Inline type hints python/pyspark/streaming 4. SPARK-37377: Refactor V2 Partitioning interface and remove deprecated usage of Distribution 5. SPARK-38085: DataSource V2: Handle DELETE commands for group-based sources 6. SPARK-37691: Support ANSI Aggregation Function: percentile_disc 7. SPARK-28516: Data Type Formatting Functions: `to_char` 8. SPARK-36664: Log time spent waiting for cluster resources 9. SPARK-34659: Web UI does not correctly get appId 10. SPARK-37650: Tell spark-env.sh the python interpreter 11. SPARK-38589: New SQL function: try_avg 12. SPARK-38590: New SQL function: try_to_binary 13. SPARK-34079: Improvement CTE table scan RESOLVED: 1. SPARK-32268: Bloom Filter Join 2. SPARK-38548: New SQL function: try_sum 3. SPARK-38063: Support SQL split_part function 4. SPARK-38432: Refactor framework so as JDBC dialect could compile filter by self way 5. SPARK-34863: Support nested column in Spark Parquet vectorized readers 6. SPARK-38194: Make Yarn memory overhead factor configurable 7. SPARK-37618: Support cleaning up shuffle blocks from external shuffle service 8. SPARK-37831: Add task partition id in metrics 9. SPARK-37974: Implement vectorized DELTA_BYTE_ARRAY and DELTA_LENGTH_BYTE_ARRAY encodings for Parquet V2 support We need to decide whether we are going to wait a little bit more or close the doors. Maxim Gekk Software Engineer Databricks, Inc. On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 9:22 AM Maxim Gekk <maxim.g...@databricks.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Here is the allow list which I built based on your requests in this thread: > > 1. SPARK-37396: Inline type hint files for files in > python/pyspark/mllib > 2. SPARK-37395: Inline type hint files for files in python/pyspark/ml > 3. SPARK-37093: Inline type hints python/pyspark/streaming > 4. SPARK-37377: Refactor V2 Partitioning interface and remove > deprecated usage of Distribution > 5. SPARK-38085: DataSource V2: Handle DELETE commands for group-based > sources > 6. SPARK-32268: Bloom Filter Join > 7. SPARK-38548: New SQL function: try_sum > 8. SPARK-37691: Support ANSI Aggregation Function: percentile_disc > 9. SPARK-38063: Support SQL split_part function > 10. SPARK-28516: Data Type Formatting Functions: `to_char` > 11. SPARK-38432: Refactor framework so as JDBC dialect could compile > filter by self way > 12. SPARK-34863: Support nested column in Spark Parquet vectorized > readers > 13. SPARK-38194: Make Yarn memory overhead factor configurable > 14. SPARK-37618: Support cleaning up shuffle blocks from external > shuffle service > 15. SPARK-37831: Add task partition id in metrics > 16. SPARK-37974: Implement vectorized DELTA_BYTE_ARRAY and > DELTA_LENGTH_BYTE_ARRAY encodings for Parquet V2 support > 17. SPARK-36664: Log time spent waiting for cluster resources > 18. SPARK-34659: Web UI does not correctly get appId > 19. SPARK-37650: Tell spark-env.sh the python interpreter > 20. SPARK-38589: New SQL function: try_avg > 21. SPARK-38590: New SQL function: try_to_binary > 22. SPARK-34079: Improvement CTE table scan > > Best regards, > Max Gekk > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 4:59 PM Tom Graves <tgraves...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Is the feature freeze target date March 22nd then? I saw a few dates >> thrown around want to confirm what we landed on >> >> I am trying to get the following improvements finished review and in, if >> concerns with either, let me know: >> - [SPARK-34079][SQL] Merge non-correlated scalar subqueries >> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32298#> >> - [SPARK-37618][CORE] Remove shuffle blocks using the shuffle service >> for released executors <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/35085#> >> >> Tom >> >> >> On Thursday, March 17, 2022, 07:24:41 AM CDT, Gengliang Wang < >> ltn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> I'd like to add the following new SQL functions in the 3.3 release. These >> functions are useful when overflow or encoding errors occur: >> >> - [SPARK-38548][SQL] New SQL function: try_sum >> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/35848> >> - [SPARK-38589][SQL] New SQL function: try_avg >> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/35896> >> - [SPARK-38590][SQL] New SQL function: try_to_binary >> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/35897> >> >> Gengliang >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 7:59 AM Andrew Melo <andrew.m...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I've been trying for a bit to get the following two PRs merged and >> into a release, and I'm having some difficulty moving them forward: >> >> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34903 - This passes the current >> python interpreter to spark-env.sh to allow some currently-unavailable >> customization to happen >> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31774 - This fixes a bug in the >> SparkUI reverse proxy-handling code where it does a greedy match for >> "proxy" in the URL, and will mistakenly replace the App-ID in the >> wrong place. >> >> I'm not exactly sure of how to get attention of PRs that have been >> sitting around for a while, but these are really important to our >> use-cases, and it would be nice to have them merged in. >> >> Cheers >> Andrew >> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 6:21 PM Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> >> wrote: >> > >> > I'd like to add/backport the logging in >> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/35881 PR so that when users submit >> issues with dynamic allocation we can better debug what's going on. >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 3:45 PM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> There is one item on our side that we want to backport to 3.3: >> >> - vectorized DELTA_BYTE_ARRAY/DELTA_LENGTH_BYTE_ARRAY encodings for >> >> Parquet V2 support (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/35262) >> >> >> >> It's already reviewed and approved. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 9:13 AM Tom Graves >> <tgraves...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > It looks like the version hasn't been updated on master and still >> shows 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT, can you please update that. >> >> > >> >> > Tom >> >> > >> >> > On Wednesday, March 16, 2022, 01:41:00 AM CDT, Maxim Gekk < >> maxim.g...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Hi All, >> >> > >> >> > I have created the branch for Spark 3.3: >> >> > https://github.com/apache/spark/commits/branch-3.3 >> >> > >> >> > Please, backport important fixes to it, and if you have some doubts, >> ping me in the PR. Regarding new features, we are still building the allow >> list for branch-3.3. >> >> > >> >> > Best regards, >> >> > Max Gekk >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 5:51 AM Dongjoon Hyun < >> dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Yes, I agree with you for your whitelist approach for backporting. :) >> >> > Thank you for summarizing. >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Dongjoon. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 4:20 PM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > I think I finally got your point. What you want to keep unchanged is >> the branch cut date of Spark 3.3. Today? or this Friday? This is not a big >> deal. >> >> > >> >> > My major concern is whether we should keep merging the feature work >> or the dependency upgrade after the branch cut. To make our release time >> more predictable, I am suggesting we should finalize the exception PR list >> first, instead of merging them in an ad hoc way. In the past, we spent a >> lot of time on the revert of the PRs that were merged after the branch cut. >> I hope we can minimize unnecessary arguments in this release. Do you agree, >> Dongjoon? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> 于2022年3月15日周二 15:55写道： >> >> > >> >> > That is not totally fine, Xiao. It sounds like you are asking a >> change of plan without a proper reason. >> >> > >> >> > Although we cut the branch Today according our plan, you still can >> collect the list and make a list of exceptions. I'm not blocking what you >> want to do. >> >> > >> >> > Please let the community start to ramp down as we agreed before. >> >> > >> >> > Dongjoon >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 3:07 PM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Please do not get me wrong. If we don't cut a branch, we are >> allowing all patches to land Apache Spark 3.3. That is totally fine. After >> we cut the branch, we should avoid merging the feature work. In the next >> three days, let us collect the actively developed PRs that we want to make >> an exception (i.e., merged to 3.3 after the upcoming branch cut). Does that >> make sense? >> >> > >> >> > Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> 于2022年3月15日周二 14:54写道： >> >> > >> >> > Xiao. You are working against what you are saying. >> >> > If you don't cut a branch, it means you are allowing all patches to >> land Apache Spark 3.3. No? >> >> > >> >> > > we need to avoid backporting the feature work that are not being >> well discussed. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 12:12 PM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Cutting the branch is simple, but we need to avoid backporting the >> feature work that are not being well discussed. Not all the members are >> actively following the dev list. I think we should wait 3 more days for >> collecting the PR list before cutting the branch. >> >> > >> >> > BTW, there are very few 3.4-only feature work that will be affected. >> >> > >> >> > Xiao >> >> > >> >> > Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> 于2022年3月15日周二 11:49写道： >> >> > >> >> > Hi, Max, Chao, Xiao, Holden and all. >> >> > >> >> > I have a different idea. >> >> > >> >> > Given the situation and small patch list, I don't think we need to >> postpone the branch cut for those patches. It's easier to cut a branch-3.3 >> and allow backporting. >> >> > >> >> > As of today, we already have an obvious Apache Spark 3.4 patch in >> the branch together. This situation only becomes worse and worse because >> there is no way to block the other patches from landing unintentionally if >> we don't cut a branch. >> >> > >> >> > [SPARK-38335][SQL] Implement parser support for DEFAULT column >> values >> >> > >> >> > Let's cut `branch-3.3` Today for Apache Spark 3.3.0 preparation. >> >> > >> >> > Best, >> >> > Dongjoon. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:17 AM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Cool, thanks for clarifying! >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:11 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> For the following list: >> >> > >> #35789 [SPARK-32268][SQL] Row-level Runtime Filtering >> >> > >> #34659 [SPARK-34863][SQL] Support complex types for Parquet >> vectorized reader >> >> > >> #35848 [SPARK-38548][SQL] New SQL function: try_sum >> >> > >> Do you mean we should include them, or exclude them from 3.3? >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > If possible, I hope these features can be shipped with Spark 3.3. >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> 于2022年3月15日周二 10:06写道： >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Hi Xiao, >> >> > >> >> >> > >> For the following list: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> #35789 [SPARK-32268][SQL] Row-level Runtime Filtering >> >> > >> #34659 [SPARK-34863][SQL] Support complex types for Parquet >> vectorized reader >> >> > >> #35848 [SPARK-38548][SQL] New SQL function: try_sum >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Do you mean we should include them, or exclude them from 3.3? >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Thanks, >> >> > >> Chao >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 9:56 AM Dongjoon Hyun < >> dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > The following was tested and merged a few minutes ago. So, we >> can remove it from the list. >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > #35819 [SPARK-38524][SPARK-38553][K8S] Bump Volcano to v1.5.1 >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > Thanks, >> >> > >> > Dongjoon. >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 9:48 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> Let me clarify my above suggestion. Maybe we can wait 3 more >> days to collect the list of actively developed PRs that we want to merge to >> 3.3 after the branch cut? >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> Please do not rush to merge the PRs that are not fully >> reviewed. We can cut the branch this Friday and continue merging the PRs >> that have been discussed in this thread. Does that make sense? >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> Xiao >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> 于2022年3月15日周二 09:10写道： >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> May I suggest we push out one week (22nd) just to give >> everyone a bit of breathing space? Rushed software development more often >> results in bugs. >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 6:23 AM Yikun Jiang < >> yikunk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> > To make our release time more predictable, let us collect >> the PRs and wait three more days before the branch cut? >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> For SPIP: Support Customized Kubernetes Schedulers: >> >> > >> >>>> #35819 [SPARK-38524][SPARK-38553][K8S] Bump Volcano to v1.5.1 >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> Three more days are OK for this from my view. >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> Regards, >> >> > >> >>>> Yikun >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> -- >> >> > >> >>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >> >> > >> >>> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 >> >> > >> >>> YouTube Live Streams: >> https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >> > Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 >> > YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> >>
