+1, Thanks Jie Yang
On 2024/10/01 03:26:40 John Zhuge wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 7:42 PM Gengliang Wang > <gengliang.w...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:22 PM Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> +1 (non-binding), promising proposal! > >> > >> 2024년 10월 1일 (화) 오전 8:04, Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org>님이 작성: > >> > >>> Thank you for the swift clarification, Reynold and Xiao. > >>> > >>> It seems that the Target Version was set mistakenly initially. > >>> > >>> I removed the `Target Version` from the SPIP JIRA. > >>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834 > >>> > >>> I'm switching my cast to +1 for this SPIP vote. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Dongjoon. > >>> > >>> On 2024/09/30 22:55:41 Xiao Li wrote: > >>> > +1 in support of the direction of the Single-pass Analyzer for > >>> Catalyst. > >>> > > >>> > I think we should not have a target version for the new Catalyst > >>> SPARK-49834 > >>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834>. It should not be > >>> a > >>> > blocker for Spark 4.0. When implementing the new analyzer, the code > >>> changes > >>> > must not affect users of the existing analyzer to avoid any user-facing > >>> > impacts. > >>> > > >>> > Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com.invalid> 于2024年9月30日周一 15:39写道： > >>> > > >>> > > I don't actually "lead" this. But I don't think this needs to target > >>> a > >>> > > specific Spark version given it should not have any user facing > >>> > > consequences? > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 3:36 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > >> Thank you for leading this, Vladimir, Reynold, Herman. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> I'm wondering if this is really achievable goal for Apache Spark > >>> 4.0.0. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> If it's expected that we are unable to deliver it, shall we > >>> postpone this > >>> > >> vote until 4.1.0 planning? > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Anyway, since SPARK-49834 has a target version 4.0.0 explicitly, > >>> > >> > >>> > >> -1 from my side. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Thanks, > >>> > >> Dongjoon. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> On 2024/09/30 17:51:24 Herman van Hovell wrote: > >>> > >> > +1 > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 8:29 AM Reynold Xin > >>> <r...@databricks.com.invalid > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > wrote: > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > +1 > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:47 AM Vladimir Golubev < > >>> vvdr....@gmail.com> > >>> > >> > > wrote: > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > >> Hi all, > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> I’d like to start a vote for a single-pass Analyzer for the > >>> Catalyst > >>> > >> > >> project. This project will introduce a new analysis framework > >>> to the > >>> > >> > >> Catalyst, which will eventually replace the fixed-point one. > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> Please refer to the SPIP jira: > >>> > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834 > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal > >>> > >> > >> [ ] +0 > >>> > >> > >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> Thanks! > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > >> Vladimir > >>> > >> > >> > >>> > >> > > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >>> > >>> > > -- > John Zhuge > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
