+1 on the assumption that we should phase this release on an incremental basis. Probably will take us to end of release 5.
HTH Mich Talebzadeh, Architect | Data Engineer | Data Science | Financial Crime PhD <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Philosophy> Imperial College London <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_College_London> London, United Kingdom view my Linkedin profile <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/> https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh *Disclaimer:* The information provided is correct to the best of my knowledge but of course cannot be guaranteed . It is essential to note that, as with any advice, quote "one test result is worth one-thousand expert opinions (Werner <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun>Von Braun <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun>)". On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 at 21:50, Ángel <angel.alvarez.pas...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > El jue, 3 oct 2024, 20:06, Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> escribió: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 7:50 AM Peter Toth <peter.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024, 08:33 Yang Jie <yangji...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1, Thanks >>>> >>>> Jie Yang >>>> >>>> On 2024/10/01 03:26:40 John Zhuge wrote: >>>> > +1 (non-binding) >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 7:42 PM Gengliang Wang >>>> > <gengliang.w...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > +1 >>>> > > >>>> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:22 PM Jungtaek Lim < >>>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > >> +1 (non-binding), promising proposal! >>>> > >> >>>> > >> 2024년 10월 1일 (화) 오전 8:04, Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org>님이 >>>> 작성: >>>> > >> >>>> > >>> Thank you for the swift clarification, Reynold and Xiao. >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> It seems that the Target Version was set mistakenly initially. >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> I removed the `Target Version` from the SPIP JIRA. >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> I'm switching my cast to +1 for this SPIP vote. >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Thanks, >>>> > >>> Dongjoon. >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> On 2024/09/30 22:55:41 Xiao Li wrote: >>>> > >>> > +1 in support of the direction of the Single-pass Analyzer for >>>> > >>> Catalyst. >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > I think we should not have a target version for the new Catalyst >>>> > >>> SPARK-49834 >>>> > >>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834>. It should >>>> not be >>>> > >>> a >>>> > >>> > blocker for Spark 4.0. When implementing the new analyzer, the >>>> code >>>> > >>> changes >>>> > >>> > must not affect users of the existing analyzer to avoid any >>>> user-facing >>>> > >>> > impacts. >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com.invalid> 于2024年9月30日周一 >>>> 15:39写道： >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > > I don't actually "lead" this. But I don't think this needs to >>>> target >>>> > >>> a >>>> > >>> > > specific Spark version given it should not have any user >>>> facing >>>> > >>> > > consequences? >>>> > >>> > > >>>> > >>> > > >>>> > >>> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 3:36 PM Dongjoon Hyun < >>>> dongj...@apache.org> >>>> > >>> wrote: >>>> > >>> > > >>>> > >>> > >> Thank you for leading this, Vladimir, Reynold, Herman. >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> I'm wondering if this is really achievable goal for Apache >>>> Spark >>>> > >>> 4.0.0. >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> If it's expected that we are unable to deliver it, shall we >>>> > >>> postpone this >>>> > >>> > >> vote until 4.1.0 planning? >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> Anyway, since SPARK-49834 has a target version 4.0.0 >>>> explicitly, >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> -1 from my side. >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> Thanks, >>>> > >>> > >> Dongjoon. >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> On 2024/09/30 17:51:24 Herman van Hovell wrote: >>>> > >>> > >> > +1 >>>> > >>> > >> > >>>> > >>> > >> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 8:29 AM Reynold Xin >>>> > >>> <r...@databricks.com.invalid >>>> > >>> > >> > >>>> > >>> > >> > wrote: >>>> > >>> > >> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > +1 >>>> > >>> > >> > > >>>> > >>> > >> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:47 AM Vladimir Golubev < >>>> > >>> vvdr....@gmail.com> >>>> > >>> > >> > > wrote: >>>> > >>> > >> > > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> Hi all, >>>> > >>> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> > >> I’d like to start a vote for a single-pass Analyzer for >>>> the >>>> > >>> Catalyst >>>> > >>> > >> > >> project. This project will introduce a new analysis >>>> framework >>>> > >>> to the >>>> > >>> > >> > >> Catalyst, which will eventually replace the fixed-point >>>> one. >>>> > >>> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> > >> Please refer to the SPIP jira: >>>> > >>> > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49834 >>>> > >>> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> > >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal >>>> > >>> > >> > >> [ ] +0 >>>> > >>> > >> > >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >>>> > >>> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> > >> Thanks! >>>> > >>> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> > >> Vladimir >>>> > >>> > >> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> > > >>>> > >>> > >> > >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > >>> > >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> > >>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > John Zhuge >>>> > >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>>> >>>>
