Although the rule is “more +1 than −1”, could we proceed in good faith? I’m following the voting thread and hoping to see how the discussion evolves. I didn’t expect the vote to be closed so suddenly while the discussion is still ongoing; otherwise, I would have cast a −1.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:04 PM Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > (Release vote criteria is "more +1 than -1", FWIW) > I also do not understand the hurry here. Just finish up the change and > re-roll a RC like we've done 100 times before. > What is the special circumstance for this RC to rush it? > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 7:18 AM Herman van Hovell via dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Dongjoon, >> >> I am not sure I follow. I have voted -1 on the release. I am a PMC member >> so that is a binding vote. Please cut a new RC and put it for another vote. >> >> Kind regards, >> Herman >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 7:29 AM Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> The vote passes with 6 +1s (3 binding +1s). >>> Thanks to all who helped with the release! >>> >>> (* = binding) >>> +1: >>> - Dongjoon Hyun * >>> - Peter Toth >>> - Kent Yao * >>> - Yang Jie * >>> - Jules Damji >>> - Scott >>> >>> +0: None >>> >>> -1: None >>> - Herman van Hovell >>> >>
