Thank you for sharing the rule with Herman, Sean. BTW, there is no hurry here. May I ask why you think in that way (we are in hurry)?
Apache Spark 4.1.0 has been prepared over 5 months with four previews and three RCs. 4.1.0 RC3 vote passes based on the ASF policy. Like RC1 and RC2, I stopped the vote with the valid reasons. I'm sure that I proceeded the RC votes until I don't see any valid Apache Spark release blockers. - v4.1.0-preview1 (7/8) - v4.1.0-preview2 (9/24) - v4.1.0-preview3 (10/27) - v4.1.0-preview4 (11/17, Release Manager: Dongjoon Hyun) - v4.1.0-rc1 (11/24, Release Manager: Dongjoon Hyun) - v4.1.0-rc2 (11/30, Release Manager: Dongjoon Hyun) - v4.1.0-rc3 (12/11, Release Manager: Dongjoon Hyun) - v4.1.0 (Now) Thanks, Dongjoon On 2025/12/16 14:03:34 Sean Owen wrote: > (Release vote criteria is "more +1 than -1", FWIW) > I also do not understand the hurry here. Just finish up the change and > re-roll a RC like we've done 100 times before. > What is the special circumstance for this RC to rush it? > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 7:18 AM Herman van Hovell via dev < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Dongjoon, > > > > I am not sure I follow. I have voted -1 on the release. I am a PMC member > > so that is a binding vote. Please cut a new RC and put it for another vote. > > > > Kind regards, > > Herman > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 7:29 AM Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> The vote passes with 6 +1s (3 binding +1s). > >> Thanks to all who helped with the release! > >> > >> (* = binding) > >> +1: > >> - Dongjoon Hyun * > >> - Peter Toth > >> - Kent Yao * > >> - Yang Jie * > >> - Jules Damji > >> - Scott > >> > >> +0: None > >> > >> -1: None > >> - Herman van Hovell > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
