+1 (non-binding)

El mié, 25 feb 2026, 19:15, vaquar khan <[email protected]> escribió:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 at 11:33, Daniel Tenedorio <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding), this should make Spark's interfaces better and simplify
>> the PySpark UDF protocols. Thanks for preparing this!
>>
>> On 2026/02/25 16:12:08 Herman van Hovell via dev wrote:
>> > Hi Spark devs,
>> >
>> > I would like to call for a vote on the SPIP: Language-Agnostic UDF
>> > Execution Protocol for Spark.
>> >
>> > Summary:
>> >
>> > The SPIP proposes a structured, language-agnostic execution protocol for
>> > running user-defined functions (UDFs) in Spark across multiple
>> programming
>> > languages.
>> >
>> > Today, Spark Connect allows users to write queries from multiple
>> languages,
>> > but support for user-defined functions remains incomplete. In practice,
>> > only Scala / Java / Python / R have working support, and it relies on
>> > language-specific mechanisms that do not generalize well to other
>> languages
>> > such as Go <https://github.com/apache/spark-connect-go>, Rust
>> > <https://github.com/apache/spark-connect-rust>, Swift
>> > <https://github.com/apache/spark-connect-swift>, TypeScript
>> > <https://github.com/BaldrVivaldelli/ts-spark-connector> or .NET
>> > <https://github.com/GoEddie/spark-connect-dotnet>, where UDF support is
>> > currently unavailable. There are also legacy limitations around the
>> > existing PySpark worker.py implementation that can be improved with the
>> > proposal.
>> >
>> > This proposal aims to define a unified API and execution protocol for
>> UDFs
>> > that run outside the Spark executor process and communicate with Spark
>> via
>> > inter-process communication (IPC). The goal is to enable Spark to
>> interact
>> > with external workers in a consistent and extensible way, regardless of
>> the
>> > implementation language.
>> >
>> > Links:
>> >
>> > SPIP Doc:
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19Whzq127QxVt2Luk0EClgaDtcpBsFUp67NcVdKKyPF8/edit?tab=t.0
>> >
>> > JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-55278
>> >
>> > Discussion Thread:
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/9t4svsnd71j7sb4r4scf2xhh8dvp3b43
>> >
>> > Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>> >
>> > [ ] +0
>> >
>> > [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because…
>> >
>> > Thanks to everyone who participated in the discussion and provided
>> valuable
>> > feedback.
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>

Reply via email to