-1: I like the idea but I think we need more discussion first.

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 1:40 PM DB Tsai <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> DB Tsai  |  https://www.dbtsai.com/  |  PGP 42E5B25A8F7A82C1
>
> On Feb 25, 2026, at 9:33 AM, Daniel Tenedorio <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding), this should make Spark's interfaces better and simplify
> the PySpark UDF protocols. Thanks for preparing this!
>
> On 2026/02/25 16:12:08 Herman van Hovell via dev wrote:
>
> Hi Spark devs,
>
> I would like to call for a vote on the SPIP: Language-Agnostic UDF
> Execution Protocol for Spark.
>
> Summary:
>
> The SPIP proposes a structured, language-agnostic execution protocol for
> running user-defined functions (UDFs) in Spark across multiple programming
> languages.
>
> Today, Spark Connect allows users to write queries from multiple languages,
> but support for user-defined functions remains incomplete. In practice,
> only Scala / Java / Python / R have working support, and it relies on
> language-specific mechanisms that do not generalize well to other languages
> such as Go <https://github.com/apache/spark-connect-go>, Rust
> <https://github.com/apache/spark-connect-rust>, Swift
> <https://github.com/apache/spark-connect-swift>, TypeScript
> <https://github.com/BaldrVivaldelli/ts-spark-connector> or .NET
> <https://github.com/GoEddie/spark-connect-dotnet>, where UDF support is
> currently unavailable. There are also legacy limitations around the
> existing PySpark worker.py implementation that can be improved with the
> proposal.
>
> This proposal aims to define a unified API and execution protocol for UDFs
> that run outside the Spark executor process and communicate with Spark via
> inter-process communication (IPC). The goal is to enable Spark to interact
> with external workers in a consistent and extensible way, regardless of the
> implementation language.
>
> Links:
>
> SPIP Doc:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19Whzq127QxVt2Luk0EClgaDtcpBsFUp67NcVdKKyPF8/edit?tab=t.0
>
> JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-55278
>
> Discussion Thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/9t4svsnd71j7sb4r4scf2xhh8dvp3b43
>
> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>
> [ ] +0
>
> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because…
>
> Thanks to everyone who participated in the discussion and provided valuable
> feedback.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>

-- 
Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
Fight Health Insurance: https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/
<https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/?q=hk_email>
Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.):
https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9  <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9>
YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau
Pronouns: she/her

Reply via email to