+1 (non binding)

Thanks and excited for the File type
Szehon

On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 11:53 AM Daniel Tenedorio <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding) from me as well. This will make Spark a stronger engine
> for processing large values, such as large images or video clips. Avoiding
> materializing the values at shuffle boundaries or other points until we
> actually need to consume the values can make pipelines stable and
> performant.
>
> On 2026/09/08 22:14:35 Yicong Huang wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I like the idea, especially for UDF to understand the FILE semantic.
> >
> > An extended idea is if it makes sense to even support a folder/directory
> as a collection of FILEs. I see many use cases have a dataset (e.g.,
> images) in a folder, and if spark can understand that's a collection of
> FILEs it would be great to handle their life cycles.
> >
> > Best,
> > Yicong
> >
> >
> > On 2026/09/08 22:03:52 Gengliang Wang wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 2:59 PM Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On 2026/09/08 20:34:38 Xiao Li wrote:
> > > > > +1 from me. This fills a real gap in Spark. Modeling files as
> either
> > > > binary
> > > > > blobs or opaque paths is awkward, especially as unstructured data
> > > > workloads
> > > > > grow.
> > > > >
> > > > > A first-class FILE type, aligned with Parquet and with lazy content
> > > > > loading, feels like the right abstraction. I support moving this
> forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > Xiao
> > > > >
> > > > > Burak Yavuz <[email protected]> 于2026年9月8日周二 12:49写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'll kick off the vote with a +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Burak
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 3:47 PM Burak Yavuz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi Spark devs,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I would like to start a vote on introducing FileType for
> handling
> > > > > >> unstructured data.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The SPIP document:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pPof896ZwcZ-2Yn-YhC4TbyYWn1umiQJykGDkAxzCWc/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.m1700lw4wsoj
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Discussion thread:
> > > > > >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/6f83qcpj1ox40jfxtottqlhjbhhxwmhf
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> JIRA Ticket:
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-59132
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, and passes if a
> majority
> > > > +1
> > > > > >> PMC
> > > > > >> votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> > > > > >> Please vote:
> > > > > >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> > > > > >> [ ] +0
> > > > > >> [ ] -1: I don't think this is a good idea because ...
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Best regards,
> > > > > >> Burak Yavuz
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to