+1

On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 12:07 PM karuppayya <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 11:30 AM John Zhuge <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Very useful.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 11:11 AM Szehon Ho <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>
>>> Thanks and excited for the File type
>>> Szehon
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2026 at 11:53 AM Daniel Tenedorio <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding) from me as well. This will make Spark a stronger
>>>> engine for processing large values, such as large images or video clips.
>>>> Avoiding materializing the values at shuffle boundaries or other points
>>>> until we actually need to consume the values can make pipelines stable and
>>>> performant.
>>>>
>>>> On 2026/09/08 22:14:35 Yicong Huang wrote:
>>>> > +1 (non-binding)
>>>> >
>>>> > I like the idea, especially for UDF to understand the FILE semantic.
>>>> >
>>>> > An extended idea is if it makes sense to even support a
>>>> folder/directory as a collection of FILEs. I see many use cases have a
>>>> dataset (e.g., images) in a folder, and if spark can understand that's a
>>>> collection of FILEs it would be great to handle their life cycles.
>>>> >
>>>> > Best,
>>>> > Yicong
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 2026/09/08 22:03:52 Gengliang Wang wrote:
>>>> > > +1
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 2:59 PM Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > +1
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On 2026/09/08 20:34:38 Xiao Li wrote:
>>>> > > > > +1 from me. This fills a real gap in Spark. Modeling files as
>>>> either
>>>> > > > binary
>>>> > > > > blobs or opaque paths is awkward, especially as unstructured
>>>> data
>>>> > > > workloads
>>>> > > > > grow.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > A first-class FILE type, aligned with Parquet and with lazy
>>>> content
>>>> > > > > loading, feels like the right abstraction. I support moving
>>>> this forward.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Xiao
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Burak Yavuz <[email protected]> 于2026年9月8日周二 12:49写道:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > > I'll kick off the vote with a +1 (non-binding)
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > Thanks,
>>>> > > > > > Burak
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2026 at 3:47 PM Burak Yavuz <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >> Hi Spark devs,
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > >> I would like to start a vote on introducing FileType for
>>>> handling
>>>> > > > > >> unstructured data.
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > >> The SPIP document:
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> > > >
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pPof896ZwcZ-2Yn-YhC4TbyYWn1umiQJykGDkAxzCWc/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.m1700lw4wsoj
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > >> Discussion thread:
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/6f83qcpj1ox40jfxtottqlhjbhhxwmhf
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > >> JIRA Ticket:
>>>> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-59132
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, and passes if a
>>>> majority
>>>> > > > +1
>>>> > > > > >> PMC
>>>> > > > > >> votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>>>> > > > > >> Please vote:
>>>> > > > > >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
>>>> > > > > >> [ ] +0
>>>> > > > > >> [ ] -1: I don't think this is a good idea because ...
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > >> Best regards,
>>>> > > > > >> Burak Yavuz
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > >>
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> John Zhuge
>>
>

Reply via email to