+1 (non-binding)

Thanks Jungtaek for driving this !

Thanks,
Anish

On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 10:01 AM Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Thank you for driving this, Jungtaek. On-demand lookups fill a real gap
> for Real-Time Mode, and the DSv2 sketch and the stream-static scope address
> my main concerns from the DISCUSS thread.
>
> I'd appreciate it if the doc could be updated to match what we agreed in
> the thread, so that it stays the reference for the implementation:
>
> - For sources supporting both `BATCH_READ` and `EXTERNAL_LOOKUP`, the
> default stays the existing join strategies (Oct 15). Q4, Q6, and Q8 still
> say that Spark chooses the lookup join automatically, and the sentence
> about the default behavior in Appendix A is cut off.
> - Stream-static joins fall back to `BATCH_READ` instead of failing (Oct 8).
> - The cache is tied to the task lifecycle, and the hint options override
> the SQL configs (Oct 8 and Oct 16).
>
> Dongjoon.
>
>
> On 2026/10/20 12:51:57 Jungtaek Lim wrote:
> > Starting from my +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 12:04 PM Jungtaek Lim <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi devs,
> > >
> > > I would live to start a vote on introducing external lookup join, as
> > > proposed.
> > >
> > > JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-60031
> > > SPIP doc:
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fBPM5cku8UJXacG2fw9df1zqALJ-WFm8E9-b9oiFP5M/edit?tab=t.0
> > > Discussion thread:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7s6tgy9cm18jnzykr8htrtrw4nxyrhp1
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, and passes if a majority
> +1
> > > PMC
> > > votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> > >
> > > Please vote:
> > > [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1: I don't think this is a good idea because ...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to