+1
2026年10月21日(水) 15:09 Yang Jie <[email protected]>: > +1 > > On 2026/10/20 17:08:44 Anish Shrigondekar via dev wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks Jungtaek for driving this ! > > > > Thanks, > > Anish > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 10:01 AM Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Thank you for driving this, Jungtaek. On-demand lookups fill a real gap > > > for Real-Time Mode, and the DSv2 sketch and the stream-static scope > address > > > my main concerns from the DISCUSS thread. > > > > > > I'd appreciate it if the doc could be updated to match what we agreed > in > > > the thread, so that it stays the reference for the implementation: > > > > > > - For sources supporting both `BATCH_READ` and `EXTERNAL_LOOKUP`, the > > > default stays the existing join strategies (Oct 15). Q4, Q6, and Q8 > still > > > say that Spark chooses the lookup join automatically, and the sentence > > > about the default behavior in Appendix A is cut off. > > > - Stream-static joins fall back to `BATCH_READ` instead of failing > (Oct 8). > > > - The cache is tied to the task lifecycle, and the hint options > override > > > the SQL configs (Oct 8 and Oct 16). > > > > > > Dongjoon. > > > > > > > > > On 2026/10/20 12:51:57 Jungtaek Lim wrote: > > > > Starting from my +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 12:04 PM Jungtaek Lim < > > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi devs, > > > > > > > > > > I would live to start a vote on introducing external lookup join, > as > > > > > proposed. > > > > > > > > > > JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-60031 > > > > > SPIP doc: > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fBPM5cku8UJXacG2fw9df1zqALJ-WFm8E9-b9oiFP5M/edit?tab=t.0 > > > > > Discussion thread: > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7s6tgy9cm18jnzykr8htrtrw4nxyrhp1 > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours, and passes if a > majority > > > +1 > > > > > PMC > > > > > votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. > > > > > > > > > > Please vote: > > > > > [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP > > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > [ ] -1: I don't think this is a good idea because ... > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] > >
