Hey Henry, Sounds good. I'll send an email to general@ shortly. I didn't realize that this vote technically counts as passing according to those rules (since plenty of PPMC gave +1).
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks to Patrick for driving the first Apache Spark release. Great job so > far. > > A bit clarification, the release VOTE passes with more than 3 +1 > binding votes from Apache Spark Podling Project Management (PPMC): > > +1 (7 Total) > Andy Konwinski > Matei Zaharia > Patrick Wendell > Reynold Xin > Chris Mattmann* > Henry Saputra* > > (* indicates IPMC) > > Since Spark is under ASF incubator we need to send another VOTE to > general@i.a.o list. > > From the ASF release management page: > " > It is Apache policy that all releases be formally approved by the > responsible PMC. In the case of the incubator, the IPMC must approve > all releases. That means there is an additional bit of voting that the > release manager must now oversee on general@incubator in order to gain > that approval. The release manager must inform general@incubator that > the vote has passed on the podling's development list, and should > indicate any IPMC votes gained during that process. A new vote on the > release candidate artifacts must now be held on general@incubator to > seek majority consensus from the IPMC. Previous IPMC votes issued on > the project's development list count towards that goal. Even if there > are sufficient IPMC votes already, it is vital that the IPMC as whole > is informed via a VOTE e-mail on general@incubator. > " > > We have 2 IPMCs Vote already so technically we need one more unless we > got veto votes against the release. > > - Henry > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The vote is now closed. Below are the vote totals. >> >> +1 (7 Total) >> Andy Konwinski >> Matei Zaharia >> Patrick Wendell >> Konstantin Boudnik >> Reynold Xin >> Chris Mattmann* >> Henry Saputra* >> >> 0 (1 Total) >> Mark Hamstra >> >> -1 (0 Total) >> >> * = Binding Vote >> >> As per the incubator release guide [1] I'll be sending this to the >> general incubator list for a final vote from IPMC members. >> >> [1] >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote >> >> - Patrick >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> >> Date: Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:10 AM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (RC6) >> To: dev@spark.incubator.apache.org >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hey Roman, >>> >>> We can do this in the future - I wasn't sure exactly what the right >>> standard approach was. Just so I understand, the change you are >>> proposing from what is there now is just to remove rcX from the >>> file-names, correct? >> >> Right. Basically your artifacts should look exactly like what >> is going to be released when the vote passes. >> >> Like I said -- it is a small nit, but it makes it easier for the >> guys like me to test the RCs in the automated manner. >> >> Thanks, >> Roman.
