It is passing with Apache Spark podling/ community but we need extra blessing from IPMCs via formal email to general@i.a.o list and in particular we need one more IPMC vote.
- Henry On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Henry, > > Sounds good. I'll send an email to general@ shortly. I didn't realize > that this vote technically counts as passing according to those rules > (since plenty of PPMC gave +1). > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Thanks to Patrick for driving the first Apache Spark release. Great job so >> far. >> >> A bit clarification, the release VOTE passes with more than 3 +1 >> binding votes from Apache Spark Podling Project Management (PPMC): >> >> +1 (7 Total) >> Andy Konwinski >> Matei Zaharia >> Patrick Wendell >> Reynold Xin >> Chris Mattmann* >> Henry Saputra* >> >> (* indicates IPMC) >> >> Since Spark is under ASF incubator we need to send another VOTE to >> general@i.a.o list. >> >> From the ASF release management page: >> " >> It is Apache policy that all releases be formally approved by the >> responsible PMC. In the case of the incubator, the IPMC must approve >> all releases. That means there is an additional bit of voting that the >> release manager must now oversee on general@incubator in order to gain >> that approval. The release manager must inform general@incubator that >> the vote has passed on the podling's development list, and should >> indicate any IPMC votes gained during that process. A new vote on the >> release candidate artifacts must now be held on general@incubator to >> seek majority consensus from the IPMC. Previous IPMC votes issued on >> the project's development list count towards that goal. Even if there >> are sufficient IPMC votes already, it is vital that the IPMC as whole >> is informed via a VOTE e-mail on general@incubator. >> " >> >> We have 2 IPMCs Vote already so technically we need one more unless we >> got veto votes against the release. >> >> - Henry >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The vote is now closed. Below are the vote totals. >>> >>> +1 (7 Total) >>> Andy Konwinski >>> Matei Zaharia >>> Patrick Wendell >>> Konstantin Boudnik >>> Reynold Xin >>> Chris Mattmann* >>> Henry Saputra* >>> >>> 0 (1 Total) >>> Mark Hamstra >>> >>> -1 (0 Total) >>> >>> * = Binding Vote >>> >>> As per the incubator release guide [1] I'll be sending this to the >>> general incubator list for a final vote from IPMC members. >>> >>> [1] >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote >>> >>> - Patrick >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> >>> Date: Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:10 AM >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (RC6) >>> To: dev@spark.incubator.apache.org >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hey Roman, >>>> >>>> We can do this in the future - I wasn't sure exactly what the right >>>> standard approach was. Just so I understand, the change you are >>>> proposing from what is there now is just to remove rcX from the >>>> file-names, correct? >>> >>> Right. Basically your artifacts should look exactly like what >>> is going to be released when the vote passes. >>> >>> Like I said -- it is a small nit, but it makes it easier for the >>> guys like me to test the RCs in the automated manner. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Roman.
