+1
*--* Best Regards! ----------------------------------- *Ray Panduro *http://spot.apache.org/ ----------------------------------- On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Michael Ridley <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Michael Ridley > Senior Solutions Architect > Cloudera > > Sent from my mobile. > Pardon any spelling errors. > > > On Nov 21, 2017, at 6:17 AM, Morris Hicks <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > >> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Nate Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I’d like to call a vote in regards to the following: > >> > >> Creation of an Ingest redesign branch (name to be determined) and > linkage > >> of this branch to a Jira epic. > >> > >> These are the proposed requirements: > >> > >> 1. Extendible to any source. > >> 2. NRT latency between ingestion and output to the HDFS/persistent > store. > >> 3. Maintain the integrity of the ODM module in order to facilitate > >> seamless integration with applications. > >> > >> Please see the design spec for more details prior to voting: > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yYaD50gp2HN9RHYaUG8ASDfh3f__ > >> GyB1Msu2LUofIU4/edit# > >> > >> I will leave the vote open for 3 days, > >> > >> - Nathanael > >> > >> On Nov 17, 2017, at 2:28 PM, Mubashir Kazia <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> +1 for breaking down into tasks. > >> > >> Let's resolve the comments in the doc and put it up for vote. Looks > good to > >> me otherwise. > >> > >> Thanks Vartika for working on this. > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Michael Ridley <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> I just realized that in my re-writing and editing of the last email I > took > >> out the part where I said that I thought it looks good. But I do think > it > >> looks good :-) > >> > >> Michael > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Michael Ridley <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Vartika- > >> > >> Thanks for the reminder about the ingestion design document. Suggest we > >> open a JIRA (unless one has already been opened and I missed it) with > the > >> specific tasks broken down (create an Epic if necessary) and attach a > PDF > >> version of the architecture document. Would also be great to get this > >> document into the Spot repo. > >> > >> Do we need a separate upstream branch? I don't think there has been > much > >> development process discussion here but I would expect the work to be in > >> the main dev branch after the patches/PRs are accepted and the JIRAs are > >> resolved. > >> > >> Michael > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Vartika Singh <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Hello all, > >> > >> The following document has been out for discussion for a while: > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yYaD50gp2HN9RHYaUG8ASDfh3f__ > >> GyB1Msu2LUofIU4/edit#heading=h.ptz51qlqt0t > >> > >> I would like to start a new branch for ingestion component. A > >> > >> Again, the idea of ingestion component is the following: > >> > >> 1. Extendible to any source. > >> 2. NRT latency between ingestion and output to the HDFS/persistent > >> store. > >> 3. Maintain the integrity of the ODM module in order to facilitate > >> seamless integration with applications. > >> > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> Vartika Singh > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Michael Ridley <[email protected]> > >> office: (650) 352-1337 > >> mobile: (571) 438-2420 > >> Senior Solutions Architect > >> Cloudera > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Michael Ridley <[email protected]> > >> office: (650) 352-1337 > >> mobile: (571) 438-2420 > >> Senior Solutions Architect > >> Cloudera > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Morris Hicks > > Strategic Enablement Expert, Cloudera > > [email protected] > > (703) 447-5883 >
