+1 On Nov 22, 2017 4:57 AM, "Nate Smith" <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 > On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Vartika Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Cesar Berho <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:26 PM, [email protected] < >> [email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> 2017-11-21 5:12 GMT-06:00 Nate Smith <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I’d like to call a vote in regards to the following: >>>> >>>> Creation of an Ingest redesign branch (name to be determined) and >> linkage >>>> of this branch to a Jira epic. >>>> >>>> These are the proposed requirements: >>>> >>>> 1. Extendible to any source. >>>> 2. NRT latency between ingestion and output to the HDFS/persistent >>> store. >>>> 3. Maintain the integrity of the ODM module in order to facilitate >>>> seamless integration with applications. >>>> >>>> Please see the design spec for more details prior to voting: >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yYaD50gp2HN9RHYaUG8ASDfh3f__ >>>> GyB1Msu2LUofIU4/edit# >>>> >>>> I will leave the vote open for 3 days, >>>> >>>> - Nathanael >>>> >>>> On Nov 17, 2017, at 2:28 PM, Mubashir Kazia <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 for breaking down into tasks. >>>> >>>> Let's resolve the comments in the doc and put it up for vote. Looks >> good >>> to >>>> me otherwise. >>>> >>>> Thanks Vartika for working on this. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Michael Ridley <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I just realized that in my re-writing and editing of the last email I >>> took >>>> out the part where I said that I thought it looks good. But I do think >>> it >>>> looks good :-) >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Michael Ridley <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Vartika- >>>> >>>> Thanks for the reminder about the ingestion design document. Suggest >> we >>>> open a JIRA (unless one has already been opened and I missed it) with >> the >>>> specific tasks broken down (create an Epic if necessary) and attach a >> PDF >>>> version of the architecture document. Would also be great to get this >>>> document into the Spot repo. >>>> >>>> Do we need a separate upstream branch? I don't think there has been >> much >>>> development process discussion here but I would expect the work to be >> in >>>> the main dev branch after the patches/PRs are accepted and the JIRAs >> are >>>> resolved. >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Vartika Singh <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> The following document has been out for discussion for a while: >>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yYaD50gp2HN9RHYaUG8ASDfh3f__ >>>> GyB1Msu2LUofIU4/edit#heading=h.ptz51qlqt0t >>>> >>>> I would like to start a new branch for ingestion component. A >>>> >>>> Again, the idea of ingestion component is the following: >>>> >>>> 1. Extendible to any source. >>>> 2. NRT latency between ingestion and output to the HDFS/persistent >>>> store. >>>> 3. Maintain the integrity of the ODM module in order to facilitate >>>> seamless integration with applications. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> Vartika Singh >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Michael Ridley <[email protected]> >>>> office: (650) 352-1337 >>>> mobile: (571) 438-2420 >>>> Senior Solutions Architect >>>> Cloudera >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Michael Ridley <[email protected]> >>>> office: (650) 352-1337 >>>> mobile: (571) 438-2420 >>>> Senior Solutions Architect >>>> Cloudera >>>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Vartika Singh > Cloudera
