-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2724/#review6510
-----------------------------------------------------------


Hello Masatake, I have a quick question about your patch.

Since you're adding new tests to test/com/cloudera/sqoop/manager, "ant test 
-Dthirdparty=true" will fail unless the test requirements are not installed 
(PostgreSql 9.1, pg_bulkload 3.1, etc).

I think that you can do either:

1) Not run your tests with "ant test -Dthirdparty=true".

or

2) Update the wiki page and user doc for setting up development env.

But since your tests are for a specific connector, I think that #1 makes more 
sense. Please let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Cheolsoo

- Cheolsoo


On 2012-01-13 05:23:36, Masatake Iwasaki wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/2724/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-01-13 05:23:36)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Patch for SQOOP-390
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-390
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SQOOP-390.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-390
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /src/java/com/cloudera/sqoop/manager/PGBulkloadManager.java PRE-CREATION 
>   /src/java/com/cloudera/sqoop/mapreduce/AutoProgressReducer.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   /src/java/com/cloudera/sqoop/mapreduce/PGBulkloadExportJob.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   /src/java/com/cloudera/sqoop/mapreduce/PGBulkloadExportMapper.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   /src/java/com/cloudera/sqoop/mapreduce/PGBulkloadExportReducer.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   /src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/manager/PGBulkloadManagerTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2724/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> This patch include the test class PGBulkloadManagerTest.
> I've tested "ant test" and passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Masatake
> 
>

Reply via email to