Thanks for the hardwork Abhijeet! Here is my vote: +1
* Verified all signatures and checksums * Verified the tag (see a nit below) * Built and ran all tests. * Did basic manual testing with default build binaries. nit: the LICENSE.txt file in the src distribution has an addendum that outlines the license details for a couple of libraires. If we end up doing a respin for any reason, I suggest that these changes be checked into the release branch so that it is identical with the source distribution. Regards, Arvind Prabhakar On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM, abhijeet gaikwad <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Devs, > As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the > release. > > *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] *** > > Details: > > 1. The list of fixed issues: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt > 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and > test result (log/*.ant_test.log): > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/ > 3. The tag to be voted upon: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1 > 4. The KEYS file: > http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS > > Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any > suggestions. > > Thanks, > Abhijeet >
