Ok. +1.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Bilung, > thank you very much for your comments. Please see my feedback inline: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:03:28PM -0700, Bilung Lee wrote: > > Thanks for volunteering! > > > > Two things though: > > > > 1) Not a show stopper. You mentioned "test result (log/*.ant_test.log)" > in > > number 2, but I don't see them there? > - That is right. I did not publish test results. All have passed though :-) > > > > > 2) The license file in "sqoop-1.4.2.tar.gz" doesn't seem to match the > > tarball content. In particular, it lists "lib/jopt-simple-<version>.jar" > > and "lib/paranamer-<version>.jar", but they are not there in the tarball? > - I had similar comment (LICENSE file was mentioning files that are not > part of the tarball) in last flume release and I was told that it should be > fine as long as all binary artifacts are mentioned there. We're also > planning to fix the LICENSE file in trunk, so that it will be ready for > next release. > > Taking my comments into account, do you think that we should create new > release candidate or are current bits acceptable for you? > > Jarcec > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM, abhijeet gaikwad > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi Devs, > > > As sent earlier today, this is the new vote we are carrying out for the > > > release. > > > > > > *** Please cast your vote by [3 working days after sending] *** > > > > > > Details: > > > > > > 1. The list of fixed issues: > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.2/CHANGELOG.txt > > > 2. The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), and > > > test result (log/*.ant_test.log): > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.2-rc1/ > > > 3. The tag to be voted upon: > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.2-rc1 > > > 4. The KEYS file: > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS > > > > > > Let me know if you are not able to access any of the links or have any > > > suggestions. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Abhijeet > > > >
