I've actually seen it without any issues :-) Jarcec
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:03:18AM -0000, Juhani Connolly wrote: > > > > On Nov. 15, 2012, 1:53 a.m., Juhani Connolly wrote: > > > Hi Hari, you just posted a sqoop issue to the flume group to review? Was > > > this your intention... I had a glance at the original issue but it didn't > > > look related to flume? > > > > Hari Shreedharan wrote: > > Sorry, old habits die hard! ;) > > > > It was not intended for Flume, but for Sqoop! > > > > Sorry for the spam! > > No problem, I guessed that might be the case, and just informed you so the > right people could see this :) > > > - Juhani > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/8063/#review13456 > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > On Nov. 15, 2012, 1:59 a.m., Hari Shreedharan wrote: > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/8063/ > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > > (Updated Nov. 15, 2012, 1:59 a.m.) > > > > > > Review request for Sqoop. > > > > > > Description > > ------- > > > > Improved thread handling in SqoopOutputFormatLoadExecutor. Removed the > > synchronized blocks and wait/notify. > > > > > > This addresses bug SQOOP-690. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-690 > > > > > > Diffs > > ----- > > > > execution/mapreduce/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/job/io/Data.java > > f6fff0b > > > > execution/mapreduce/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/job/mr/SqoopOutputFormatLoadExecutor.java > > 0d636ae > > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8063/diff/ > > > > > > Testing > > ------- > > > > Ran unit tests, and on a real cluster. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hari Shreedharan > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
