Sounds good! Thanks for the clarification and hard work on this release. Thanks, Abhijeet On 24 Dec 2012 14:38, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Abijeet, > thank you very much for your vote, I appreciate your time. > > Currently we have only one shared LICENSE file for both source and binary > artifact, so it's expected that it covers jars that are not shipped with > source artifact. We've built the license file based on current binary > artifact, so it should not have any extra entries. There are 3 main sources > for third party jars in binary artifact: > > * client/lib/ > * server/lib/ > * server/webapps/sqoop.war (inside the archive) > > I would guess that the extra entries you're seeing are "hidden" in the > sqoop.war archive. > > Jarcec > > On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 08:58:44PM +0530, abhijeet gaikwad wrote: > > src: build and test successful > > > > Verified the artifacts. > > Few extra jar names in License.txt (src as well bin), but no reason for a > > re-spin! > > > > +1. > > > > Thanks, > > Abhijeet > > > > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > This is the first cut of Sqoop 2 branch, version 1.99.1. Purpose of > this > > > release is to provide early bits to our users so that they can test the > > > product and provide early feedback. > > > > > > Changes in RC1: > > > > > > * Fixed NOTICE file > > > > > > *** Please cast your vote by Friday 2012-12-24 *** > > > > > > The list of fixed issues: > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.txt;h=568454754625bedd8be97d2cefed030725211051;hb=9158dc99b3b9bce812fdf2ed48f41231d701e025 > > > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5, *.sha1): > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.1-rc1/ > > > > > > The tag to be voted upon: > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.1-rc1 > > > > > > The KEYS file: > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS > > > >
