+1 at all - build was successful - verified checksums
Great work Jarcec! On Dec 24, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > * Tests seems to be passing > * Top level files seems to be correct > * License file seems to be correct > * Signatures and checksums are correct > > Jarcec > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:22:03PM -0800, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: >> This is the first cut of Sqoop 2 branch, version 1.99.1. Purpose of this >> release is to provide early bits to our users so that they can test the >> product and provide early feedback. >> >> Changes in RC1: >> >> * Fixed NOTICE file >> >> *** Please cast your vote by Friday 2012-12-24 *** >> >> The list of fixed issues: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.txt;h=568454754625bedd8be97d2cefed030725211051;hb=9158dc99b3b9bce812fdf2ed48f41231d701e025 >> >> The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5, *.sha1): >> http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.99.1-rc1/ >> >> The tag to be voted upon: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.99.1-rc1 >> >> The KEYS file: >> http://www.apache.org/dist/sqoop/KEYS > >
