+1

On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Hari Shreedharan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jarcec, 
> 
> Sounds great! I think that this is a good time for an incremental release for 
> the Sqoop 2 branch with the number of issues fixed. 
> 
> +1 for community RM.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Hari
> 
> -- 
> Hari Shreedharan
> 
> 
> On Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> 
>> Hi Sqoop developers,
>> It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under version 
>> 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the development 
>> counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be resolved [2]. 
>> There is countless bug fixes and several new features including but not 
>> limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC Connector, brand new client 
>> API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal type that is essentially must 
>> have for imports from Oracle.
>> 
>> That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the 1.99 line 
>> named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that was in 
>> place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step up as a 
>> Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've step up to 
>> be the mentor.
>> 
>> During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one got 
>> the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it would be 
>> fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this 
>> option to the broader community.
>> 
>> I would love to hear others thoughts!
>> 
>> Jarcec
>> 
>> 1: http://s.apache.org/jw
>> 2: http://s.apache.org/SeI
> 
> 

Reply via email to