This is great! + 1 Thanks, Abhijeet On Apr 5, 2013 1:35 AM, "Venkat Ranganathan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks everyone. It looks like there is agreement in giving me the > opportunity to volunteer as a community RM for this release. It is a > great opportunity for me to learn and contribute in this capacity and my > thanks and appreciation for the same. With that thought, I accept this > opportunity. > > Thanks > > Venkat > > On Mon Apr 1 14:55:56 2013, Kathleen Ting wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Will McQueen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Apr 1, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Hari Shreedharan <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jarcec, >>>> >>>> Sounds great! I think that this is a good time for an incremental >>>> release for the Sqoop 2 branch with the number of issues fixed. >>>> >>>> +1 for community RM. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Hari >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Hari Shreedharan >>>> >>>> >>>> On Friday, March 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Sqoop developers, >>>>> It has been 3 months since first release from Sqoop2 branch under >>>>> version 1.99.1. Since then there has been steady activity in the >>>>> development counting 75 closed JIRAs [1] with additional 9 soon to be >>>>> resolved [2]. There is countless bug fixes and several new features >>>>> including but not limited to adding scheme support in Generic JDBC >>>>> Connector, brand new client API or adding splitter for numeric/decimal >>>>> type >>>>> that is essentially must have for imports from Oracle. >>>>> >>>>> That being said I would like to propose doing a new release in the >>>>> 1.99 line named 1.99.2. Sqoop PMC has agreed to follow the same model that >>>>> was in place for couple of previous releases where one committer will step >>>>> up as a Mentor and will guide community volunteer to do the release. I've >>>>> step up to be the mentor. >>>>> >>>>> During last release we had two community volunteers and sadly only one >>>>> got the chance to drive the release. Having said that I think that it >>>>> would >>>>> be fair to give the opportunity to the other volunteer prior offering this >>>>> option to the broader community. >>>>> >>>>> I would love to hear others thoughts! >>>>> >>>>> Jarcec >>>>> >>>>> 1: http://s.apache.org/jw >>>>> 2: http://s.apache.org/SeI >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>
