-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14351/#review26421
-----------------------------------------------------------


Hi Abe,
thank you very much for taking this one up! I believe that we also needs to 
cover upgrade path when one is updating derby repository from prior Sqoop 
versions. Would you mind adding that?

Jarcec

- Jarek Cecho


On Sept. 26, 2013, 8:02 p.m., Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/14351/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 26, 2013, 8:02 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop, Hari Shreedharan and Jarek Cecho.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SQOOP-1208
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1208
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> commit 2ee24e0ca20925523cb3c8a87d9c414bcdd80293
> Author: Abraham Elmahrek <[email protected]>
> Date:   Thu Sep 26 12:59:42 2013 -0700
> 
>     SQOOP-1208 Sqoop2: job ID column is too small
>     
>     Increased it to 50
> 
> :100644 100644 0a196f0... 4184129... M        
> repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbySchemaQuery.java
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbySchemaQuery.java
>  0a196f0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14351/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran sqoop tests and verified fix locally.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Abraham Elmahrek
> 
>

Reply via email to