----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26931/#review57766 -----------------------------------------------------------
A couple of design thoughts... Good start! client/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/client/request/ResourceRequest.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26931/#comment98740> If Kerberos is not enabled, will this work? Also, if Authentication is disabled, will this work? client/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/client/request/ResourceRequest.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26931/#comment98743> This may not be necessary with Kerberos. Also, re-authentication seems kind of forced. Maybe tokenization would be useful? Maybe in a follow up Jira? - Abraham Elmahrek On Oct. 20, 2014, 2:56 p.m., richard zhou wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/26931/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 20, 2014, 2:56 p.m.) > > > Review request for Sqoop. > > > Repository: sqoop-sqoop2 > > > Description > ------- > > SQOOP-1527: Kerberos support (SPNEGO) in communication between server and > client > This is an initial patch. > This patch depends on SQOOP-1526, which is under reviewing > (https://reviews.apache.org/r/26678/diff/#) > > > Diffs > ----- > > client/pom.xml b2e221ec3b5398c05fa081989e73cf1f2c4d43e5 > client/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/client/request/ResourceRequest.java > c84a83e3fd7c550645bda8cf5a0ecc844ef7721d > server/pom.xml 67baaa57da9f69f2e8795107ca1b6186eaef2b9c > server/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/filter/SqoopAuthenticationFilter.java > PRE-CREATION > server/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml > d31120a367329a7868e64e4215c168bedaf3aac7 > shell/pom.xml 947eab02b229f734640c30de3a7d45ba86656d58 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26931/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > richard zhou > >