> On Oct. 21, 2014, 8:49 p.m., Veena Basavaraj wrote:
> > Nice. Are there any tests pending?

Second nudge, are you planning on adding tests?


> On Oct. 21, 2014, 8:49 p.m., Veena Basavaraj wrote:
> > core/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/authentication/AuthenticationHandler.java,
> >  line 27
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26678/diff/4/?file=724270#file724270line27>
> >
> >     remove thse superflous comments, it is pretty clear that it is logger 
> > no?
> 
> richard zhou wrote:
>     I have removed it, while I see these code everywhere... Driver.java, 
> ConnectorManager.java...

yeah we should stop doing it at somepoint and clean the rest too. docs for the 
sake of docs is pretty cheesy. thanks for removing it, I apprecite it.


> On Oct. 21, 2014, 8:49 p.m., Veena Basavaraj wrote:
> > core/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/authentication/AuthenticationHandler.java,
> >  line 35
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26678/diff/4/?file=724270#file724270line35>
> >
> >     shoud not security enabled be on by default?

can you please answer this?


> On Oct. 21, 2014, 8:49 p.m., Veena Basavaraj wrote:
> > core/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/authentication/AuthenticationManager.java,
> >  line 40
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26678/diff/4/?file=724272#file724272line40>
> >
> >     dont we need any thread safety around creation of these singletons? 
> > since I see a bunch of the methods been synchronized
> 
> richard zhou wrote:
>     Actually, I am wondering why to write singletons like these. But, since 
> almost every Manager (RepositoryManager.java, ConnectorManager.java, ...) has 
> such mechanism, so I write the similar code:)

same thing as above, I would encourage to ask why it is done the certian way 
no? If there is better pattern go for it. 

BTW, I am still waiting to know if these managers need to be thread safe?


> On Oct. 21, 2014, 8:49 p.m., Veena Basavaraj wrote:
> > dist/src/main/server/conf/sqoop.properties, line 142
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/26678/diff/4/?file=724276#file724276line142>
> >
> >     commented out? are these defaults?
> 
> richard zhou wrote:
>     The default value is SIMPLE.
>     If uncommented, the KERBEROS will be used when starting sqoop server 2

hope this is in the java doc somewhere


- Veena


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26678/#review57731
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 22, 2014, 12:44 a.m., richard zhou wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26678/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 22, 2014, 12:44 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Kerberos support when starting service
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/pom.xml 2b6e436d637eb03493323e5b36e31e433c1f8bbb 
>   
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/authentication/AuthenticationConstants.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/authentication/AuthenticationError.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/authentication/AuthenticationHandler.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/authentication/AuthenticationHandlerFactory.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/authentication/AuthenticationManager.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/authentication/KerberosAuthenticationHandler.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/authentication/SimpleAuthenticationHandler.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/core/SqoopServer.java 
> ac836c7cee010144696ab17645ccd008aed5762d 
>   dist/src/main/server/conf/sqoop.properties 
> bb010166120321899425f84edb8e1ad6512626d2 
>   pom.xml f25a29f6db673e6080dcd5ccd51bab76ab38bff4 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26678/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> richard zhou
> 
>

Reply via email to