-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27360/#review59079
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


LGTM


connector/connector-generic-jdbc/src/main/resources/generic-jdbc-connector-config.properties
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/27360/#comment100371>

    I'm concerned that our users don't know exactly what's the classpath (i.e. 
they may not be Java developers)
    
    Perhaps "... name of the JDBC driver that... Note: The driver must be in 
the sqoop lib directory."



connector/connector-generic-jdbc/src/main/resources/generic-jdbc-connector-config.properties
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/27360/#comment100376>

    from should be FROM for consistency? (and I think its clearer too)


- Gwen Shapira


On Oct. 29, 2014, 11:42 p.m., Veena Basavaraj wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/27360/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 29, 2014, 11:42 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop and Jarek Cecho.
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> see jira
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> connector/connector-generic-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/jdbc/GenericJdbcToInitializer.java
>  1747347 
>   
> connector/connector-generic-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/jdbc/configuration/FromJobConfig.java
>  12ceb21 
>   
> connector/connector-generic-jdbc/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/jdbc/configuration/ToJobConfig.java
>  2428601 
>   
> connector/connector-generic-jdbc/src/main/resources/generic-jdbc-connector-config.properties
>  c535e9b 
>   
> connector/connector-generic-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/jdbc/TestToInitializer.java
>  243de01 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27360/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> yes
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Veena Basavaraj
> 
>

Reply via email to