----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28463/#review63094 -----------------------------------------------------------
repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbyRepositoryHandler.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28463/#comment105258> is this new issue? I am wondering how we missed his earlier? repository/repository-derby/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/TestRespositorySchemaUpgrade.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/28463/#comment105257> I might some more help understanding the test case. - Veena Basavaraj On Nov. 25, 2014, 6:49 p.m., Qian Xu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/28463/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 25, 2014, 6:49 p.m.) > > > Review request for Sqoop. > > > Bugs: SQOOP-1812 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1812 > > > Repository: sqoop-sqoop2 > > > Description > ------- > > Unexpected behaviour: Sqoop2 server tries to add an existing constraint > repeatedly. > > > Diffs > ----- > > > repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbyRepositoryHandler.java > 907978f > > repository/repository-derby/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/TestRespositorySchemaUpgrade.java > 928c34a > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28463/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Added a test case to guard the scenario > > > Thanks, > > Qian Xu > >
