-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28463/#review63096
-----------------------------------------------------------



repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbyRepositoryHandler.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28463/#comment105261>

    nm, seems like we dont have a check to not enter this code path if the 
version is already the current version, !



repository/repository-derby/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/TestRespositorySchemaUpgrade.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/28463/#comment105260>

    so on fresh install there is no repo, hence a version = 0, upgrade is done 
and repo version is set to 4 .
    
    Next we restart and repo version is 4, it is hard to capture this in a test 
case. So I am not clear what we will be asserting.
    
    Second, calling both of these, is not going to help
        super.createOrUpgradeSchemaForLatestVersion();
    58  
        handler.createOrUpgradeRepository(getDerbyDatabaseConnection());


- Veena Basavaraj


On Nov. 25, 2014, 6:49 p.m., Qian Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28463/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 25, 2014, 6:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SQOOP-1812
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1812
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Unexpected behaviour: Sqoop2 server tries to add an existing constraint 
> repeatedly.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> repository/repository-derby/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/DerbyRepositoryHandler.java
>  907978f 
>   
> repository/repository-derby/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/derby/TestRespositorySchemaUpgrade.java
>  928c34a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28463/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added a test case to guard the scenario
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to