[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14241384#comment-14241384
]
Veena Basavaraj commented on SQOOP-1870:
----------------------------------------
Please read the comments from the top [~jarcec] it might become more clear
>>>>
Might be a good idea to move the CSV Implementation to the SPI as well, if we
are going to use this as default.
Any utils can left in the connector-utils package, so we know that only
utilities are in that package and nothing else.
Jarek Jarcec Cecho this seems much cleaner to avoid the cyclic dependency going
forward and having a dilemma on where should connector core classes reside.
> IDF API and impementation package depednency
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-1870
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1870
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: sqoop2-framework
> Reporter: Veena Basavaraj
> Assignee: Veena Basavaraj
> Fix For: 1.99.5
>
>
> Currently the IDF API is in connector SDK package,
> The right place for IDF API is sqoop-spi package since custom implementations
> of the IDF can be done in future.
> Instead today sqoop SPI that holds connectors depends on SDK which in fact
> should be the other way round, the connector API is the root and should not
> depend on its implemenation package.
> connector SDK was intended to hold concrete implementations and some extent
> utility classes that the connectors use, there is obvioulsy some leaks and
> execution engine even depends on connecto-rsdk
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
