[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14258523#comment-14258523
]
Sqoop QA bot commented on SQOOP-1870:
-------------------------------------
Testing file
[SQOOP-1870-v2.patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12689069/SQOOP-1870-v2.patch]
against branch sqoop2 took 0:00:24.142271.
{color:red}Overall:{color} -1 due to 2 errors
{color:red}ERROR:{color} failed to build with patch (exit code 1,
[report|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/841/artifact/patch-process/install.txt])
{color:red}ERROR:{color} Patch does not add/modifny any test case
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Clean was successful
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch applied correctly
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} License check passed
Console output is available
[here|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/841/console].
This message is automatically generated.
> IDF API and impementation package depednency
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-1870
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1870
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: sqoop2-framework
> Reporter: Veena Basavaraj
> Assignee: Veena Basavaraj
> Fix For: 1.99.5
>
> Attachments: SQOOP-1870-v1.patch, SQOOP-1870-v2.patch,
> SQOOP-1870.patch
>
>
> Currently the IDF API is in connector SDK package,
> The right place for IDF API is sqoop-spi package since custom implementations
> of the IDF can be done in future.
> Instead today sqoop SPI that holds connectors depends on SDK which in fact
> should be the other way round, the connector API is the root and should not
> depend on its implemenation package.
> connector SDK was intended to hold concrete implementations and some extent
> utility classes that the connectors use, there is obvioulsy some leaks and
> execution engine even depends on connecto-rsdk
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
