+1 on continuing with the release without 0.20 artifacts The Hadoop 0.20 profile is actually not Apache Hadoop 0.20, it’s specific to CDH3 instead [1]. It’s there from the time when Sqoop was Cloudera project running on github and we’ve just not updated it since then. Knowing that those bits might not work on pure Apache Hadoop 0.20, I would even go as far as dropping that profile completely if nobody objects.
Jarcec Links: 1: https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/trunk/build.xml#L126 > On May 4, 2015, at 11:40 AM, Venkat Ranganathan > <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1. Good work identifying this Gwen. > > If this is an issue, we can remedy it in 1.4.7 > > Venkat > > > > > On 5/4/15, 11:29 AM, "Abraham Elmahrek" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm +1 on this. I doubt there are many users of 0.20 these days. >> >> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Gwen Shapira <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Sqoop Developers, >>> >>> There was a slight oversight on my part as a release mentor and Sqoop 1.4.6 >>> passed a vote with 0.20 artifacts missing. >>> >>> I suggest that since the vote passed, we can release the artifacts we voted >>> on, even though 0.20 is missing. Under the assumption that if 0.20 was >>> critical, the issue would be raised during the voting process (I believe >>> 0.20 is pretty much extinct by now). >>> >>> Any objections? >>> >>> Gwen >>>
