Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2015 2:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Sqoop 1.4.6 release lacking 0.20 artifacts
I've pushed the release artifacts to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/sqoop/1.4.6/. -Abe On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <[email protected]> wrote: > We have 3 +1s from PMC... I'm going to push the 1.4.6 release artifacts. > Thanks Gwen for finding the issue and every one for jumping in! > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Abraham Elmahrek <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hmm let's close this thread. Do we need an official vote thread? Or >> can we move forward without it? >> >> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho >> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 on continuing with the release without 0.20 artifacts >>> >>> The Hadoop 0.20 profile is actually not Apache Hadoop 0.20, it’s >>> specific to CDH3 instead [1]. It’s there from the time when Sqoop >>> was Cloudera project running on github and we’ve just not updated it >>> since then. Knowing that those bits might not work on pure Apache >>> Hadoop 0.20, I would even go as far as dropping that profile completely if >>> nobody objects. >>> >>> Jarcec >>> >>> Links: >>> 1: https://github.com/apache/sqoop/blob/trunk/build.xml#L126 >>> >>> > On May 4, 2015, at 11:40 AM, Venkat Ranganathan < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1. Good work identifying this Gwen. >>> > >>> > If this is an issue, we can remedy it in 1.4.7 >>> > >>> > Venkat >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On 5/4/15, 11:29 AM, "Abraham Elmahrek" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I'm +1 on this. I doubt there are many users of 0.20 these days. >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Gwen Shapira >>> >> <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Hi Sqoop Developers, >>> >>> >>> >>> There was a slight oversight on my part as a release mentor and >>> Sqoop 1.4.6 >>> >>> passed a vote with 0.20 artifacts missing. >>> >>> >>> >>> I suggest that since the vote passed, we can release the >>> >>> artifacts >>> we voted >>> >>> on, even though 0.20 is missing. Under the assumption that if >>> >>> 0.20 >>> was >>> >>> critical, the issue would be raised during the voting process (I >>> believe >>> >>> 0.20 is pretty much extinct by now). >>> >>> >>> >>> Any objections? >>> >>> >>> >>> Gwen >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
