-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39927/#review105075
-----------------------------------------------------------



test/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/test/testcases/ConnectorTestCase.java 
(lines 285 - 286)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39927/#comment163454>

    I don't like the idea that we're delaying every single test case for every 
single repository implementation by 3 seconds only because of one repository 
implementation.
    
    What about fixing the root of the problem rathern just inserting sleep? 
Would it be fair to assume that the MySQL repository is not fully initialized 
at the time we're submitting the job? If so, can't we simply not run the test 
case until the Sqoop 2 server fully started and all is initialized?


- Jarek Cecho


On Nov. 4, 2015, 1:36 a.m., Colin Ma wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39927/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 4, 2015, 1:36 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There are 2 problems should be fixed with MySql repository:
> 1. Can't detect the repository version correctly.
> 2. There should suspend several seconds when execute the job in the 
> integration test.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> common-test/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/common/test/db/MySQLProvider.java 
> 268e475 
>   
> common-test/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/common/test/repository/MysqlRepositoryProvider.java
>  229b339 
>   
> repository/repository-mysql/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/repository/mysql/MySqlRepositoryHandler.java
>  fd3a3f2 
>   test/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/test/testcases/ConnectorTestCase.java 
> 8e3d7df 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39927/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Colin Ma
> 
>

Reply via email to